> On 3 Feb 2020, at 17:43, Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, February 3, 2020 at 8:45:30 AM UTC-7, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 2 Feb 2020, at 04:48, Alan Grayson <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Can anyone offer a justification for this postulate, presumably at the heart 
>> of the MWI? Clark? AG
> 
> It is a direct consequence of the assumption of mechanism, where physics 
> emerge from all computations (in arithmetic). So, you don’t need to postulate 
> a physical world to understand that all consistent computations “happens”, 
> and Everett formulation of QM can be seen as a conformation of the mechanist 
> theory of mind.
> 
> A key point in both Mechanism and Everett is that although all computations 
> “happens”, they do not happen relatively to each other with the same relative 
> probabilities. That can be used to refute some “ethical critics” that some 
> people use against Everett.
> 
> Bruno
> 
> So if I put on my left shoe first today, there's must be a universe in which 
> I put on my right shoe first. And then there are the many ways I can tie my 
> shoe laces, each resulting in more universes. This is about the most 
> ridiculous model conceivable, don't ya think? Put another way, this is just 
> plain dumb. AG 

The fact is that all those computations are executed in all models of 
elementary arithmetic. To deny them, you need to either deny that 2+2=4 or deny 
the Church-Turing thesis.

And quantum mechanics without collapse, or just quantum field theory, confirms 
this, by providing evidence that if we want the exact decimal for the 
probability o find an electron at B when he starts at A, we have to sum on all 
path that the electron can take for going from A to B.

You have to assume a non-mechanist theory of mind to sustain your ontological 
commitment in a primitively physical universe.

Bruno 





> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1683342-69c3-4564-b18e-b3064f02e4c0%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a1683342-69c3-4564-b18e-b3064f02e4c0%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fefeccf-64dd-49a1-ad6f-842fb0fad192%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5fefeccf-64dd-49a1-ad6f-842fb0fad192%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/B4BA993A-A7F2-4D49-88F9-973E630A2ACD%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to