On 2/7/2020 8:14 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 1:26 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 2/7/2020 5:57 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:

    There is nothing that picks out one particular set of paths as
    preferred in the many-worlds situation.

    Sure you can.  For example you can pick out the set of paths whose
    statistics are within some bounds of the mean.


Assuming you know what the 'mean' is absent any experiment.

The mean is estimated by the average of the experimental values.

Otherwise you are just cherry picking data to support your arbitrary theory.

    One can only get that in a stochastic one-world model.

    All paths occur in a stochastic one-world model too.


No they don't. They are possible, perhaps, but they do not necessarily occur.

They don't /necessarily/ occur.  But they probabilistic occur.  Otherwise it wouldn't be a stochastic model.  So it seems that all you objections to MWI apply equally.


      The only difference is that some probability measure is assumed
    as part of the model.


And this gives one a principled reason for ignoring the paths that are not observed.

Why not ignore them because they are not observed?  That's a principled reason.

Low probability has an independent meaning in the one-world case, so one is unlikely to observe a low probability set of results.

One is unlikely to observe a result that is realized in only a small fraction of the MW branches.  I agree that MWI fails to derive the Born rule.  But I don't agree that it is inconsistent with it, given the version of MWI that postulates many branches...not just one per possible outcome.

Brent

Not impossible, but of low probability, where that means 'unlikely'. No comparable concept of probability is available in Many-worlds.

Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSFXFe7JjNqThgXSH-bJvz879OV7EEu5ymNjU8iZuJ-BQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSFXFe7JjNqThgXSH-bJvz879OV7EEu5ymNjU8iZuJ-BQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4526cbb6-9501-1d3c-8a75-e6332ba9f180%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to