On Saturday, February 8, 2020 at 1:38:05 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
>
> ?? MWI is just an interpretation. 
>


Most of what I read in the Everett context refers to a* theory*:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-everett/ :

Hugh Everett III’s relative-state formulation of quantum mechanics is a 
proposal for solving the quantum measurement problem by dropping the 
collapse dynamics from the standard von Neumann-Dirac formulation of 
quantum mechanics. Everett intended to recapture the predictions of the 
standard collapse theory by explaining why observers nevertheless get 
determinate measurement records that satisfy the standard quantum 
statistics. There has been considerable disagreement over the precise 
content of his theory and how it was suppose to work. Here we will consider 
how Everett himself presented the *theory*, then briefly compare his 
presentation to the many-worlds interpretation and other no-collapse 
options.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08132 :

Mad-Dog Everettianism: Quantum Mechanics at Its Most Minimal
Sean M. Carroll 
<https://arxiv.org/search/quant-ph?searchtype=author&query=Carroll%2C+S+M>, 
Ashmeet 
Singh <https://arxiv.org/search/quant-ph?searchtype=author&query=Singh%2C+A>
(Submitted on 23 Jan 2018)

To the best of our current understanding, quantum mechanics is part of the 
most fundamental picture of the universe. It is natural to ask how pure and 
minimal this fundamental quantum description can be. The simplest quantum 
ontology is that of the Everett or Many-Worlds interpretation, based on a 
vector in Hilbert space and a Hamiltonian. Typically one also relies on 
some classical structure, such as space and local configuration variables 
within it, which then gets promoted to an algebra of preferred observables. 
We argue that even such an algebra is unnecessary, and the most basic 
description of the world is given by the spectrum of the Hamiltonian (a 
list of energy eigenvalues) and the components of some particular vector in 
Hilbert space. Everything else - including space and fields propagating on 
it - is emergent from these minimal elements.


@philipthrift 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0718b947-b0f9-48f8-bf23-6f12fe6cadbb%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to