On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 at 12:16:41 PM UTC+1, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 2 Mar 2020, at 17:42, PGC <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Then show me a worm's brain working in arithmetic. The felicity of doing 
> so wouldn't ever mean, we've truly achieved what we set out to do, but the 
> model and simulation would shed light on how far or close we are to 
> realizing the core component of the thought experiment, and therefore it's 
> plausibility at some point in time. Then people could make up their own 
> minds on whether the problem is valid, or as Wittgenstein suggests, 
> apparently a time waster of the usual kind, which ontological reasoning and 
> identity questions have 2000 years track record of being. A German 
> conservative parliamentarian intent on blocking parliament from some action 
> he was opposed to, recently stated in a newspaper: "we should have a 
> fundamental discussion on the subject."; knowing full well that all one has 
> to do to block action is to loose people in defending their fundamental 
> convictions.  
>  
>
>> the fact that you survive or die is not a metaphor. 
>>
>
> Well, show us!
>
>
>
> Saying for an artificial brain, and surviving with it, like we assume when 
> we bet on mechanism, is not metaphorical. The artificial brain is no more a 
> metaphor than an artificial heart.
>
> You talk like if I was trying to prove Mechanism to be true, but that is 
> simply not the case.
>
>
> Bruno
>

Nobody needs mechanism or a multiverse to get infinite Brunos. 

"Which Bruno?" yours truly ends up asking: The Bruno that advocates 
mechanism, the other Bruno that would never do such a thing, the Bruno that 
is platonist, the Bruno that is agnostic, the Bruno that enjoys life, the 
immortal Bruno that sees life as a prison samsara, the humble Bruno, the 
proud prize winning Bruno, the victim Bruno, the Einstein Bruno etc? 
Eventually, with so many Brunos and their goalposts, there is one 
certainty: Bruno's friends, supporters, companions, and peers, on this list 
or beyond it, are fine, generous, and open-minded people. 

They have the only thing that may approach a "correct attitude towards 
science", something that might be worth remembering from time to time. PGC
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/652451a6-17e1-4e60-80c3-08a96ca89837%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to