My primary difficulty with this is not that this is a possibly useful math-method, but that I have little physical sense of what this means. As some combinatorics or paths or states this may have some utility, but this to me is not terribly much a real physical theory.
LC On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 at 3:13:05 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > *Wolfram Models as Set Substitution Systems* > https://github.com/maxitg/SetReplace > > cf. https://www.wolframphysics.org/ > > Stephen Wolfram (Ph.D. in theoretical physics at the California Institute > of Technology in 1979—at the age of 20): > > “I’m disappointed by the naivete of the questions that you’re > communicating.” > > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/physicists-criticize-stephen-wolframs-theory-of-everything/ > > “I don’t know of any others in this field that have the wide range of > understanding of Dr. Wolfram,” Feynman wrote ( in 1981). > > > @philipthrift > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/897d9661-c3bf-49de-9435-9b93fc1dffec%40googlegroups.com.
