On Friday, February 5, 2021 at 7:11:52 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:53 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> *> The formula for PE is valid for fixed rest mass M,*
>
>
> NO! Assuming General Relativity is correct the formula PE= -(G*M^2)/R is 
> valid for* ANY* mass, even a photon of light because a photon contains 
> energy and M=E/C^2, and a photon of light is about as far from being 
> "fixed" as you can get. 
>

*You misunderstand. For a particular mass M, the formula works. But in your 
model M increases for an expanding vacuum sphere. Do you mean to sum over 
the individual masses, to get the total PE? Anyway, without more 
information, I don't see how you can calculate the KE -- which you don't 
do! -- to establish the final result; net gravitational energy = zero.  AG*

>
> *> In the case of an expanding sphere of vacuum energy, by what process 
>> does rest mass increase? *
>
>
> I don't know what to tell you Alan, you keep asking the same question 
> over and over again and I keep answering it, but rather than actually 
> reading what I say and critiquing my answer you just ask the exact same 
> question again.  
>

*As far as I can tell, you just keep asserting that the rest mass increases 
as the vacuum sphere increases, but I haven't seen anything other than an 
assertion. If I am mistaken, why not copy and paste your alleged previous 
explanation. AG *

>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b8ca24b5-1348-478b-91c2-d36f7791eff7n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to