Serf's opinion follows: If we go by Everett-Wheeler+DeWitt, they were (correct 
if this is wrong please) non-specific on what caused the splitting, or 
uncovering the differences in parallel universe. My own emotional fav is that 
humans were 'evolved' to accelerate the sensing (making choices) upon what we 
sense, thus, causing more splits, or making choices that uncovered splits (your 
own choice of explanations is welcome). So, our species evolved to make 
machinery that travels outwards to also cause more split-ends. Any sufficiently 
advanced AI should do? To my way of thinking, Schrödinger's cat sits not in a 
box but astride Wigner's Friend head, ever-watching. 
The physics is kind of like medieval writers asking how many angels can dance 
on the head of a pin? Unless, some friendly, Neanderthal, trades-people Voob-In 
wanting to trade our sweet potatoes, for their ample supply of helium-3, it's 
rather pedantic to this peasant. It is excellent, however for scifi/alternate 
worlds fantasies. You could re-write every factual history say, of the middle 
ages to include south Africans or Chinese, in Europe, because, hey, it's 
another world and another world-line, etc.  Superman's shows could be 
all-Black, because why not? It'd be their own  universe(s) where the cause and 
effect of things simply rolled that way. Roll the dice and see what happens 
next? Comics writers have already done this. Whether these publications have 
been as successful as the old school ones, is something I have no idea of? 
Yeah, Deutsch's quantum computing might be occurring in other realities to 
account for the behavior? Or, there assuredly is simpler explanations done by 
other physicists, to be sure.  So, I say that 3,238 angels can dance on the 
head of a pin. Now, the next question is what dances? Minuets or Electric Slide 
Boogie? 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Clark <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, Feb 3, 2021 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: Falling Outward (was: Words, definitions, and Many "Worlds")

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 10:05 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
 
 > in GR universes evolve in time, but cannot instantaneously evolve faster 
 > than the SoL.

In 1905 Einstein discovered Special Relativity and said nothing whatsoever 
could move faster than light, but by 1915 he had found General Relativity and 
had to amend that to some extent, he still insisted that matter or energy or 
information cannot move through space faster than light, but he placed no speed 
limit on how fast space itself can expand.  

> In the MWI, worlds come into existence fully formed as it were, that is, 
>replete with copies of observers. You want to have your cake and eat as well; 
>that is, appealing to GR, but inconsistently instantaneously creating fully 
>formed worlds, say like the one we live in. AG 

MWI doesn't say if a new universe is created instantaneously or if the new 
creation only comes into existence at the speed of light; it doesn't say 
because it does it need to, it works fine either way. MWI Is agnostic about 
that.  

> If your claim that the net energy of the universe is zero is associated with 
> the universe as a whole, not for some part of it, then it must be 
> speculative. No calculation can be done to establish it.  Correct?

Correct, that can only be established through observation and experimentation. 
However if General Relativity is correct and if empty space does contain 
residual vacuum energy (both those things can only be determined through 
observation and experimentation but the evidence is piling up that both are 
correct) then the net amount of energy in the universe is indeed zero.
John K Clark


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0A9bG7km12%2BTaY5tZfxWmE5UzkbLDC82n4vdVVC1pCWw%40mail.gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/777295637.2054683.1612470157940%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to