Salam alaikum These might be of interest: https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2020/06/draft-all-about-nafs.html
https://signsandscience.blogspot.com/2017/05/human-body-or-soul.html > > > So, I think we are saying the same thing here. Therefore the issue is, why do > we seem to be disagreeing with one another. I think I can begin to perceive > an answer when you say. > > > > What is more rational? Dead matter having aseity or LIFE having aseity. Dead > matter cannot produce life. LIFE can produce dead matter and life. > > > > If you substitute consciousness for the word LIFE… > > > > (What is more rational? Dead matter having aseity or Consciousness having > aseity. Dead matter cannot produce Consciousness. Consciousness can produce > dead matter and life.) > > > > Then this more or less equates with my view. > > > > Some of the key points: Consciousness having aseity [being sufficient unto > its self?] given that I am seeking an explanation for what consciousness is I > have to consider if that is possible for my consciousness. Several > perspectives arise; if I have an immortal soul, perhaps but I cannot tell > this until I die. Hmmm… If you are saying that consciousness has asiety then > I think I can agree with that. > > > > How can Impersonal Consciousness produce personal beings? A Personal Aseitous > Being is a necessary Reality. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/64995D81-5A5B-42BA-B80A-9E21AC5783D6%40gmail.com.
