I have read Rovelli's paper. I am disappointed. What Rovelli suggest is eliminativism. Red (a) (what I see) does not exist but red (b) (electromagnetic wave peaking near 564–580 nm) exists.
Rovelli should have read first: Donald D. Hoffman. The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes, 2019. Evgenii Brent schrieb am Sonntag, 28. März 2021 um 00:35:27 UTC+1: > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > *The Old Fisherman's Mistake* > > ROVELLI, Carlo (2021) > > Abstract > > A number of thorny issues such as the nature of time, free will, the clash > of the manifest and scientific images, the possibility of a naturalistic > foundation of morality, and perhaps even the possibility of accounting for > consciousness in naturalistic terms, seem to me to be plagued by the > conceptual confusion nourished by a single fallacy: the old fisherman's > mistake. > > http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18837/1/Pescatore.pdf > > > Rovelli has it exactly right. > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/532cbc34-a25f-43a0-8087-0b121288fa18n%40googlegroups.com.
