I have read Rovelli's paper. I am disappointed. What Rovelli suggest is eliminativism. Red (a) (what I see) does not exist but red (b) (electromagnetic wave peaking near 564–580 nm) exists.
Rovelli should have read first: Donald D. Hoffman. The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes, 2019. Evgenii Brent schrieb am Sonntag, 28. März 2021 um 00:35:27 UTC+1: > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > > *The Old Fisherman's Mistake* > > ROVELLI, Carlo (2021) > > Abstract > > A number of thorny issues such as the nature of time, free will, the clash > of the manifest and scientific images, the possibility of a naturalistic > foundation of morality, and perhaps even the possibility of accounting for > consciousness in naturalistic terms, seem to me to be plagued by the > conceptual confusion nourished by a single fallacy: the old fisherman's > mistake. > > http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18837/1/Pescatore.pdf > > > Rovelli has it exactly right. > > Brent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/532cbc34-a25f-43a0-8087-0b121288fa18n%40googlegroups.com.
