Rovelli is a loop quantum gravitation maven. This is a very ontological physics, and explains in part Rovelli's stance. The though has occurred to me that maybe LQG states are the kernel of some sort of target map. Either than or they are epistemic/ontologically uncertain and in an epistemic setting target map to zero.
LC On Monday, March 29, 2021 at 2:05:33 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > I have read Rovelli's paper. I am disappointed. What Rovelli suggest is > eliminativism. Red (a) (what I see) does not exist but red (b) > (electromagnetic wave peaking near 564–580 nm) exists. > > Rovelli should have read first: > > Donald D. Hoffman. The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth > from Our Eyes, 2019. > > Evgenii > > Brent schrieb am Sonntag, 28. März 2021 um 00:35:27 UTC+1: > >> >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> >> >> *The Old Fisherman's Mistake* >> >> ROVELLI, Carlo (2021) >> >> Abstract >> >> A number of thorny issues such as the nature of time, free will, the >> clash of the manifest and scientific images, the possibility of a >> naturalistic foundation of morality, and perhaps even the possibility of >> accounting for consciousness in naturalistic terms, seem to me to be >> plagued by the conceptual confusion nourished by a single fallacy: the old >> fisherman's mistake. >> >> http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/18837/1/Pescatore.pdf >> >> >> Rovelli has it exactly right. >> >> Brent >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/72677d11-ca95-4653-a487-8b0f8cebe8e1n%40googlegroups.com.
