[Philip Benjamin]
First of all, just a cue: most if not all postings here are responses to
the postings of somebody else. I identify certain things, especially occultist
mysticism, as WAMP [Western Acade-Media Pagan(ism)] and not science, which does
not refer to any particular person(s), rather a self-description or a general
observation . Paganism is genuinely germane here, since civilized and erudite
pagan Augustine’s “instant transformation” pulled the West out from Greco-Roman
PAGANISM, philosophies, polytheistic superstitions and “unknown gods” into a
path of knowable universe and investigative explorations that finally led to
the development of science and technologies which the rest of the pagan world
of civilizations and mystic scholarships could not initiate. The WAMP is a
stealing beneficiary of that Augustinian Trust, including the Five Day
workweek, Sabbaticals, etc. which are uniquely Scriptural and unheard of in
other cultures. That is not “white trash” (N/A to Philip Benjamin anyway) as
some here label, but a hard historical fact.
As regards Bruno Marchal’s musings below, some general points need be
enumerated.
1 . Ones’ worldview is not necessarily science, even if it be based on
scientific observations. Bohr’s Taoism or Jungian sorceries are not
necessarily sciences. They are worldviews based on the notions of
particle-wave dualism and the BOTH & logical fallacy. Wave-
likeness is not waviness. Particles behave like waves which can be
described mathematically by via AS IF logic.
2 . Bio dark-matter is to astrophysical dark-matter, as bio light-matter
(Periodic Table) is to astrophysical light-matter (H & He).
3 . laws of chemistry are universal. Chemical bonds are spin-governed particle
configurations of duets and octets.
4 . It is more unethical than unscientific to deny chemistry to 95% of unknown
matter, but accept that for 5% of the known matter.
5 . Bio dark-matter particles of negligible mass with respect to electrons may
compose of axions, monopoles and/or neutrinos or
something else.
6 . There is an “Additional Mass” reported on growth, and the same mass
missing on death of organisms grown in hermetically sealed
tubes.
These experiments are reproducible and there is no legitimate reason why
the WAMP do not repeat them for confirmation.
7 . There is an increase of biophoton emission rate by an order of magnitude
across the taxa (from human cells to plant cells in
Petri-dish). Also, the biophoton emission rates increase with stress on
the cell growth with a burst of biophotons at cell death.
Note: All references to all these experiments have been cited before.
Philip Benjamin
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On
Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 11:45 AM [email protected]
Subject: Re: Q Anon is the tip of the iceberg
On 26 Feb 2021, at 16:41, Philip Benjamin
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
PB. From a scientific point of view, awakening refers to the extrinsic
energization of the non-electric, non-entropic, bio twin formed from the moment
of conception from bio dark-matter and its chemistries.
>From a scientific point of view that is a (vague) theory. I will wait for the
>axioms, and the consequences, and the means of testing.
If by Pagan you mean the believer in Matter, you seem doubly Pagan to me, as
you assume two sorts of matter.
Personally I tend to see (weak) Materialism as a lasting superstition. It will
disappear from the natural science, or the science of the observable, like
vitalism has disappeared from biology.
What what I see are universal machine measuring numbers and inferring all sorts
of relation betweens those numbers. And yes, some claim bizarre things about
those things not capturable by numbers, and they are correct on this.
When doing metaphysics with the scientific method, we can use, today, the tools
provided by mathematical logic, to distinguish better the realities (“models”
or “interpretations” in the sense of logician) and the
theories/machines/words/numbers/finite-thing we are tackling about, and can be
talking with, or “in” (standard use).
I have no idea of your assumptions, and invoking dark matter is very weird, do
you mean a theory with axions? I am not sure anybody have found a theory of
Dark Matter, and I am personally skeptical on any ontological matter, as there
are no evidence for that (despite Newtonian physics would contradict Mechanism,
and be an evidence against mechanism if it were true).
Gödel’s theorem protects Mechanism from Diagonalisation à la Lucas-Penrose, and
it happens that it protects mechanism from many misuse of quantum mechanics,
that it predicts “semantically” and “syntactlcally”, and this without
ontological commitment, just the usual simple fact of the type 2+2=4 or KSK =
S, ...
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SA0PR11MB4704AABEF2D5F503B0864548A87A9%40SA0PR11MB4704.namprd11.prod.outlook.com.
