On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 3:03 AM <[email protected]> wrote: *1. Don didn't build a decent fence despite all his crowing about it. * >
That's true he didn't, but I have to ask, were you surprised, did you really think he would build a wall, and did you also think he would get Mexico to pay for it? Did you really think even Trump believed what he was saying was true? Maybe I'm weird but I tend to get a bit angry when somebody looks me straight in the face and tells me something that I know for a fact is a lie, but that doesn't seem to irritate the Trump zombies one bit. Some people are excellent liars and it's extremely difficult to tell that they're not being sincere, but despite an enormous amount of practice Trump never became good at that skill. When Trump was giving a speech he might as well have the words "I AM A LIAR" tattooed in big bold letters on his forehead. > 2. He did slap China with tariffs > Yep, and who paid those tariffs, China? Nope, the middle class consumer paid for those Chinese tariffs. And as someone who claims he wants smaller government, how can you justify the government ordering me (using the threat of violence) not to buy a widget from China and I must instead buy a widget from Oklahoma that costs more and is of lower quality? Trump said he's a tariff's man, well I'm a libertarian and that means I'm a free market man. * > 3. He kept the Indian IT workers imported down to a low roar..* > Yeah he did, and if you think the way the win the technology war that will define the future is to make sure very smart scientifically minded people don't enter the country then you're nuts. 4. *> nflation good, employment better. Better than Obama,* > BULLSHIT. *> yeah, despite your info, which I challenge because I experienced it. * > The perfect example of a *NON*-Scientific person is somebody who thinks personal anecdotes are more important than the scientific method. > > * He* [Trump] *was fair on Covid,* > You must be kidding, I mean it, you are kidding aren't you? * > Straight answer as my Trump-hating brother in law agreed the other day, > that the corruption worldwide by the rich will likely be some sort of war > to get a chance for my Adhocracy as a multiple citizens advisory board to > ram through the advice and consent of the Congressional wonder boys and > girls. (paid off). That's quick take.* > What the hell! I am unable to parse any of that. I need a Rosetta Stone for the Spudize language. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> n4r qq9 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3u7%2B%2BC8W-Od31fbBtKO_C4gD2f1zQRRqqAi6ueF5g8Ww%40mail.gmail.com.
