On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:52 AM smitra <smi...@zonnet.nl> wrote:

> On 07-04-2022 02:30, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> > The preferred basis is not determined by algorithms -- it is
> > determined by robustness under decoherence. You can redefine
> > everything so that your theory is no longer quantum mechanics -- but
> > that is a fairly pointless exercise.
>
> That's the preferred basis as used in practice. But that's useless in
> this context and it would amount to doing things  things backward.
> Observers cannot be defined using decoherence. That you do robustness
> under decoherence allows for us as stable observers to exist. So
> decoherence explains our existence.
>

It also explains our ability to make measurements and record results. To
claim that this is not a fundamental account of measurement is just silly.
Nothing is more fundamental than quantum entanglement evidenced in
decoherence.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTFaQZd0e-hepmh0s6Wn%3DoDsPkUkGNPAdhb2TK734Qcbw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to