On 4/26/2022 11:38 AM, smitra wrote:
You do realize don't you that if you take this view you've made QM
personal and epistemic so we can forget all the MWI muddle and adopt
QBism whose only problem is that what you think reality is, is
personal.
One may get to something that looks like QBism, but one cannot
conclude that reality is personal within the framework that I suggest.
Why not. Each algorithm has it's own data, it's own prior, and so
it's own idea of reality. Sounds like QBism to me.
Yes, but QBism is more than just that, it makes assumptions like there
not being a universal wavefunction.
But in your version the universal wave function is an otiose assumption,
a fiction put on top of the algorithmic experiences.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/98a08879-625b-9d76-e9c3-c11a0792881a%40gmail.com.
