On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 1:25 PM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> wrote:

*> The unresolved problem is that if you're using the frequentist > interpretation of probability, you must count and compare the number of > outcomes for each measurement possibility, but you can't do this without > knowing that the outcomes that result are in the same Worlds. But for this > to be true requires another axiom imposed on the SE,* Exactly what axiom would that be? It can't be the Born rule because that is not an axiom, that is an experimentaly derived fact. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> ewb 3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0tBQ9dh4kUEUukfy5RUROwuPWJdiE4TPBZkEL5-9_z_Q%40mail.gmail.com.