Am Do, 20. Okt 2022, um 20:45, schrieb Brent Meeker: > > > On 10/20/2022 9:29 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: >> >> >> Am Do, 20. Okt 2022, um 17:56, schrieb John Clark: >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:03 AM Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> *> I mean... I don't know what to tell you. You really think that the most >>>> likely explanation for her hiring someone to install an email server in >>>> her bathroom instead of using existing government infrastructure is her >>>> "being sloppy"?* >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> *> Really?* >>> >>> Yes really. >>> >>>> > *Then why would she bother doing this?* >>> >>> Because official government email servers are notoriously slow, cumbersome >>> to set up , run on ancient hardware and software intend to Crash often, and >>> are unintuitive to use. It's bizarre, I'm talking about Trump's high >>> treason and you're talking about Hillary's email server that didn't conform >>> to regulations. >> >> Well the emails that did not conform to regulations contained some details >> from the BBC article that you neglected to address. I will leave a few here. >> >> "According to the latest leaked emails, Mrs Clinton told a Goldman Sachs >> conference she would like to intervene secretly in Syria. >> >> She made the remark in answer to a question from Lloyd Blankfein, the bank's >> chief executive, in 2013 months after she left office as secretary of state. >> >> "My view was you intervene as covertly as is possible for Americans to >> intervene," she told employees of the bank in South Carolina, which had paid >> her about $225,000 to give a speech." >> >> "In a 12-page memo >> <http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-048f-da25-a55e-efaf30b60000> written >> by Doug Band, a longtime aide to Bill Clinton, he describes using his >> consulting firm to raise money for the Clinton Global Initiative as well as >> direct personal income for the former president. >> Mr Band rallied clients of his firm, Teneo, to contribute directly to Mr >> Clinton for "in-kind services for the President and his family - for >> personal travel, hospitality, vacation and the like" referring to that fund >> as "Bill Clinton Inc". >> >> Several companies directly paid the former president for his speeches or >> advice, as well as making contributions to the Clinton Global Initiative. >> Republicans have criticised this, saying it allowed corporations to pay for >> access to the former president. >> >> One client, Coca Cola, received a face-to-face meeting with the former >> president at his home in 2009, after contributing millions to the non-profit >> foundation." >> >> "The Clinton campaign tried to reschedule the Illinois presidential primary >> to a month later, so as to make it less likely that a moderate Republican >> would get a boost following the Super Tuesday primaries. >> "The Clintons won't forget what their friends have done for them," future >> Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook wrote in the November 2014 email to Mr >> Podesta." >> > > I don't see anything illegal or even clearly unethical in that list. It > looks like innuendo from Fox News.
It's the BBC... The British news organization with the Churchillian gravitas that you guys admire so much. So let me get this straight: Hillary Clinton was privately briefing Goldman Sachs on an event that she was payed 225K to attend on how she was planning a war in secret that was unpopular with the public. Now that I put it this way, this must be the most American thing that I read in weeks. Maybe you guys are right, I guess I'm too European for this (although we are the ones dealing with the humanitarian crisis that arise from your "escapades" in the Middle East). Nevermind. Telmo > Have the Clinton's siphoned off money from their non-profit foundation for > personal use? That would not be terribly surprising, but nothing says they > did. Getting people and corporations to contribute to a foundation is > commonplace and in principle benign. > > Brent > > >> >> >>> >>> >>>> *> Sure, Trump is much worse than Clinton.* >>> >>> Then what the hell are we arguing about? >>> >> >> We are arguing about the fact that if you insist of giving people a choice >> between a turd sandwich and an even bigger turd sandwich that the >> establishment also does not like, you shouldn't be terribly surprised if >> they pick the latter just to spite you. >> >> Telmo >> >>> John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> >>> r4c >>> >>>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f6f7f51-d17e-4b12-9ca5-9d4d82336b04%40app.fastmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/5f6f7f51-d17e-4b12-9ca5-9d4d82336b04%40app.fastmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/991ef7dd-16f6-ff19-43c1-ee9118c75c06%40gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/991ef7dd-16f6-ff19-43c1-ee9118c75c06%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a6504977-96c2-482b-8d09-2356a271e0be%40app.fastmail.com.
