Scott Alexander Siskind, the Psychiatrist? More to the point of the nature O' 
consciousnesses is Stephon Alexander, the physicist at Brown University. 

Home | Alexander Theory Lab (stephonalexanderlab.com)


 The Autodidactic Universe - NASA/ADS (harvard.edu)

OR, physicist, Vitaly Vanchurin at U Minn/Duluth via his Neural net concept. 
[2008.01540] The world as a neural network (arxiv.org)

♬ It's the Sky, Lord, It's the Sky!♪ (Me, a Clog-dancing). Take it, Brother 
Penrose!





    On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 04:37:01 PM EST, Brent Meeker 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
  
 
 On 1/23/2024 12:52 PM, John Clark wrote:
  
 
  On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:38 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
    
  
   > Who wrote this?  you, JC?
  
 
   No, Scott Alexander did, he's a pretty smart guy but I think he got some 
things wrong. I did write this in the comments section:  
   "You say "If we’re lucky, consciousness is a basic feature of information 
processing and anything smart enough to outcompete us will be at least as 
conscious as we are" and I agree with you about that because there is evidence 
that it is true. I know for a fact that random mutation and natural selection 
managed to produce consciousness at least once (me) and probably many billions 
of times, but Evolution can't directly detect consciousness any better than I 
can, except in myself, and it can't select for something it can't see, but 
evolution can detect intelligent behavior. I could not function if I really 
believed that solipsism was true, therefore I must take it as an axiom, as a 
brute fact, that consciousness is the way data feels when it is being processed 
intelligently.     
 You've written this before, but I slightly disagree with it.  I think 
Evolution can detect consciousness as directly or indirectly as intelligence.  
Consciouness is imagining the world with you as an actor within it.  It's a 
kind of thinking necessary for planning, i.e. for an advanced form of 
intelligence.  The consciousness you talk about is just awareness, perception; 
that's processing data.
 
 
    
 You also say "consciousness seems very closely linked to brain waves in 
humans" but how was that fact determined? It was observed that when people 
behave intelligently their brain waves take a certain form and when they don't 
behave intelligently the brain waves are different than that. I'm sure you 
don't think that other people are conscious when they are sleeping or under 
anesthesia or dead because when they are in those conditions they are not 
behaving very intelligently. 
 
 As for the fear of paperclip maximizers, I think that's kind of silly. It 
assumes the possibility of an intelligent entity having an absolutely fixed 
goal they can never change, but such a thing is impossible. In the 1930s Kurt 
Gödel prove that there are some things that are true but have no proof and Alan 
Turing proved that there is no way to know for certain if a given task is even 
possible. For example, is it possible to prove or disprove that every even 
number greater than two is the sum of two prime numbers? Nobody knows. If an 
intelligent being was able to have goals that could never change it would soon 
be caught in an infinite loop because sooner or later it would attempt a task 
that was impossible, that's why Evolution invented the very important emotion 
of boredom.   Certainly human beings don't have fix goals, not even the goal of 
self preservation, and I don't see how an AI could either."
     
 
 Good point.
 
 Brent
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/051b7b4c-2f6d-42b0-b1a9-28fa82013088%40gmail.com.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2061878596.1201389.1706046645948%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to