On 1/23/2024 2:12 PM, John Clark wrote:


On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 4:37 PM Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:



    On 1/23/2024 12:52 PM, John Clark wrote:
    On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 3:38 PM Brent Meeker
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        //
        /> Who wrote this?  you, JC?/


    No, Scott Alexander did, he's a pretty smart guy but I think he
    got some things wrong. I did write this in the comments section:

    "You say "If we’re lucky, consciousness is a basic feature of
    information processing and anything smart enough to outcompete us
    will be at least as conscious as we are" and I agree with you
    about that because there is evidence that it is true. I know for
    a fact that random mutation and natural selection managed to
    produce consciousness at least once (me) and probably many
    billions of times, but Evolution can't directly detect
    consciousness any better than I can, except in myself, and it
    can't select for something it can't see, but evolution can detect
    intelligent behavior. I could not function if I really believed
    that solipsism was true, therefore I must take it as an axiom, as
    a brute fact, that consciousness is the way data feels when it is
    being processed intelligently.

    />You've written this before, but I slightly disagree with it.  I
    think Evolution can detect consciousness as directly or indirectly
    as intelligence. /


I agree,Evolution can detect intelligence so it can only detect consciousness if it is an inevitable byproduct of intelligent data-processing.
You're missing my point that there are at least two different meanings of "conscious" and only one necessarily accompanies intelligence (and isn't exactly a "byproduct")  It's just awareness or perception.  It doesn't include reflection and self-awareness, but in can include a lot of intelligence, including learning.

The second meaning, which is the kind we prize as uniquely human, is self-awareness.  I think it's what you refer to as a "byproduct", but my point is that it's another level of intelligence and hence is subject evolution just like any other aspect of intelligence.  This second meaning is planning, and planning depends on having a self-model.  If I do this and that happens how will I feel and what will I do then.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/8d19f6db-6be9-48a7-9c8d-0affb4005dad%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to