On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:35 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:
*> **a deterministic interpretation of a probability theory must mean that > the wf collapse can be modeled dynamically, and this is what Objective > Collapse theories are attempting to construct.* > > > *No. Schrodinger's Equation is 100% deterministic * > > > *> Of course, but the measurement PROBLEM is collapse of the wf, and this > is what Objective Collapse is trying to solve to make Copenhagen > deterministic. * > *NO! Objective Collapse theories are NOT deterministic, Schrodinger's equation is but they add a random element so the wave collapses at a RANDOM time. And an objective collapse fan would be insulted if you said he was a believer in Copenhagen. * John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> OCT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv13_QfG4Jf_NKGv9PQ_OdLy9rbf%2BttDt13kamDLqeocUw%40mail.gmail.com.
