On Saturday, November 23, 2024 at 9:04:19 PM UTC-7 Bruce Kellett wrote:

On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:25 PM smitra <[email protected]> wrote:

On 22-11-2024 09:30, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 7:05 PM smitra <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 22-11-2024 06:40, Brent Meeker wrote:
>> 
>>> That's what is ruled out by violation of Bell's inequality.
>> 
>> Bells' theorem doesn't apply to QM,
> 
> I think it is about time that you read Bell's papers.  His theorem is
> not about hidden variable theories, or non-local theories. He assumes,
> for the purposes of argument, a local theory.

He assumes a deterministic local hidden variable theory.


Which theory is that, then?

> He then derives a series
> of inequalities that such a local theory must satisfy. Experimentally,
> these inequalities are violated. Inspection of standard QM gives
> results that agree with experiment, but these results also require
> non-locality.

No, non-locality is not required.

> The conclusion drawn from these experiments is that
> quantum mechanics, itself, is non-local.

No, that's not the conclusion.


If QM were intrinsically local, then you would be able to give this local 
account of the correlations.
You are manifestly unable to do this.


*What exactly do you mean by "local account of the correlations"? Would you*
*agree that the fact the wf extends infinitely in all directions and 
changes in*
*time infinitely in all directions sufficiently establishes that QM is 
non-local? AG * 

 

If there were any truth in what you are 
saying, then you wouldn't have Sidney Coleman saying things like this:

https://youtu.be/EtyNMlXN-sw?t=2023

And Prof. Marletto wouldn't have put point nr. 2 on her slide:

https://youtu.be/DT61eSiOs50?t=299


I think it is better to rely on the mathematics rather than on so-called 
authorities.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/aa99cc61-bd90-43a2-ae51-1923b776fee5n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to