Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2016, 20:12 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:02:49 +0200, Steffen Winkler wrote: > > As for bogofilter: It works without any problems. No bugs or > > anything, > > just has a lousy spam detection rate. > > Bogofilter works perfect for me. It detects nearly all spam and there > are nearly no false positives. The very first training period was > short, even with spam detection features, provided by ISPs disabled. > Spamassassin does use RBLs, so it might require no first training, > but > OTOH RBLs and additional features not provided by bogofilter, could > lead > to more false positives. > > I guess bogofilter is better to filter to an individual user's needs, > while spamassassin has got advantages for mail servers that deliver > many users. > > Regards, > Ralf > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > [email protected] > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list Ah, sorry. I didn't mean it like bogofilter was bad or anything. It's just that I told both tools to filter a bunch of emails and spam assassin moved some to my spam folder while bogofilter didn't.
I think that maybe bogofilter worked the entire time but I just didn't saw it because it never moved anything into the junkfolder and I didn't saw a bogofilter process appearing. Where spamasassin has it's sa-learn and spamd process that pop up when you teach it something or tell it to filter through emails. I worded that completely wrong, I apologize. _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
