Another option involves user interaction. On a new message or a reply type the 
name explicitly, do not let autocomplete do it's thing; click the X in the 
little window that pops up. Then remove the now-identified bad address from the 
Address Book. Yeah, I know, getting users to reliably perform steps is not 
reliable.

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:33:05 +0000









Okay, what’s odd is we have FIM synchronizing the GAL in both locations (which 
populates the x500 addresses). We had to add them on the company2.com mailboxes
 so users could reply/forward internal emails pre-dating the migration. I’ll 
have to see if FIM syncs that data, as I am pretty confident it does. But if 
it’s a matter of updating the Mail Contacts on company1.com to include that 
info, we should be able to
 handle that.
 

Thank you everyone. Very sincerely appreciated.
-Geoff

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:16 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
You should be able to add contract records for them, and then add X500 address 
objects to the contacts.
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:05 AM

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
Excuse my lack of clarity, I misused some terminology I think. "Quick Contacts" 
was meant to be "Address Book Cache" or "Cached Address Book" from what I'm 
seeing it described as online. Sorry for any confusion.
 
We did use NirSoft NK2 Editor for the "company2.com" destination side of 
things. So if User1 migrated from "company1.com" to "company2.com" we modified 
their AutoStream.dat file so they have all their Address Book cache, etc. The 
problem
 is for users at "company1.com", their Address Book Cache has the user's old 
information (from when they were housed on company1.com Exchange servers). The 
problem is while there are only ~20 users in Company 2, our company has ~3,000 
users and I don’t know
 of a way to script the removal of these addresses from users’ Address Book 
Cache.
 
So again, our issue is that we migrated users from our Exchange server to their 
own. Now our users are unable to reply/forward to emails prior to the migration 
or send to the users from their Address Book Cache for ‘company2.com’ email
 addresses. I’m wondering if there is anything we can do on our Exchange server 
to point those ~20 addresses so replying/forwarding those old emails will still 
resolve and send successfully to their own Exchange server. I didn’t think 
there was anything we
 could do on the source domain side (outside of modifying Address Book Cache on 
a user-by-user basis). But I know there is a fair number of people that are a 
lot smarter than me on here, so wanted to pick their brains before I fall back 
on the advisory email/instructions
 we have already sent out.
 

Thanks,
Geoff

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Gavin Wilby

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:27 AM

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
We use Nirsoft’s NK2 editor for this, it takes a second to load and then delete 
the old contacts off the machines in one swoop.
 
(ignore the name is NK2, it works with all version’s of Outlook).
 

Gavin Wilby
IT Support Engineer

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault

Sent: 15 September 2014 23:20

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 

By your description a "quick contact" is an Outlook-local contact. It's failing 
for the reason you note and, more importantly, will _never_ look to the server 
to re-resolve this address. Outlook contacts are locally-managed
 only; no server-side fix.


Since there are so few re-create them properly on the server and continue to 
have users delete them as the problem comes up.




On Sep 15, 2014, at 14:11, "Orlebeck, Geoffrey" <[email protected]> 
wrote:



All:
 
We performed a migration where we took a domain that was previously hosted on 
our company’s Exchange server (Company1.com) and
 migrated them to their own AD/Exchange environment (company2.com).

 
We migrated the x500 addresses from when Company 2 was on our network so
company2.com so users could reply/forward internal email (or use quick 
contacts) without issue. The problem is that users in our Org (company1.com) 
have quick contacts pointing to the x500
 address information from when company2.com was still hosted on our 
(company1.com) Exchange servers. Now that Company 2 is “external” these emails 
fail (which we would expect). We sent out
 an advisory email and whenever a user calls, we’ve shown them how to delete 
the quick contact and add user from Global Address List (we have FIM 2010 
running GALSync) and emails work.

 
There are only ~20 addresses for
company2.com, so if we can manually update the proxyAddress attribute or 
something else, that’s fine. But we’re a little unsure on how to allow
company1.com to accept the old x500 address and still forward it out to
company2.com
 
Here’s the network details in case it helps:
*Exchange 2010 SP3 on both sides
*Two-way Forest trust established
*FIM 2010 running GALSync w/ Cross-Forest Delegation to sync GAL and allow 
delegation w/in Outlook
*Both Forests are housed in our datacenter, so while they are separated, they 
can be hit via internal IPs w/o traversing WAN
 
Thank you for your time.
 
-Geoff
 
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential
 and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited.
 If you received this transmission in error, please accept our apologies and 
notify the sender. Thank you.



SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited and SMP Fund Services Limited are 
licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision Commission. SMP Accounting & 
Tax
 Limited is a member of the ICAEW Practice Assurance Scheme.
SMP Partners Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration No: 
000908V

Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, P.N. Eckersley, S.E McGowan, O. Peck, 
J.J. Scott, S.J. Turner
SMP Trustees Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration No: 
068396C

Directors: A.C. Baggesen, M.W. Denton, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, J. Watterson, J. 
Cubbon
SMP Fund Services Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration 
No: 120288C

Directors: V. Campbell, M.W. Denton, P.N. Eckersley, D.A. Manser, S.E McGowan, 
O. Peck, J.J. Scott, R.K. Corkill
SMP Accounting & Tax Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company 
Registration No: 001316V

Directors: I.F. Begley,  A.J. Dowling, P. Duchars, P.N. Eckersley, J.J. Scott, 
S.J. Turner
SMP Capital Markets Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration 
No: 002438V

Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, D.F Hudson, S.E McGowan, O. Peck, J.J. 
Scott.
SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited, SMP Fund Services Limited, SMP 
Accounting & Tax Limited and SMP Capital Markets Limited are members of the SMP 
Partners
 Group of Companies.
 
This email is confidential and is subject to disclaimers. Details can be found 
at:
http://www.smppartners.com/disclaimer.html


______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

______________________________________________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain
 information protected by state and federal medical privacy statutes. They are 
intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you received
 this transmission in error, please accept our apologies and notify the sender. 
Thank you.


Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended
 only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please accept our 
apologies and notify the sender. Thank
 you.                                     

Reply via email to