Yes, dealing with higher-ups can be tricky. "It's a product limitation, sir. 
Without going into the technical details, unless you want them, Outlook 
considers this functionality to be completely under user control. There are no 
administrative or server-side ways to deal with this." But even that can call 
into question as to whether your statement is true. Not an easy situation.

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:04:35 +0000









That’s what we’ve done. We sent an email informing all users if they are 
sending to anyone at “company2.com”, they will need to delete the Address Book 
Cache contact,
 then rediscover/re-add from GAL, and then they’ll be fine.
 
The problem is users ignore the email and call the helpdesk. One of the users 
was a VP of a department and so it went from a simple “here’s how to delete and 
re-add”
 to “It’s a problem for an important person, can we resolve it without user 
intervention?” So just going down this path to explore options. Overall we 
don’t know which users on our end are affected, so we can’t target them without 
filtering through logs for
 whoever sent an email to “company2.com” address. Blegh. No thanks. 
 
I’d have no issue removing the Autostream across the board. However, I’m sure 
you are well aware the Address Book Cache
is “contacts” for some users (however wrong or unfortunate that is). And while 
a standard low-level user we could get away with saying “create contacts from 
now on”. Doing that to the CEO or any VP level staff would likely result in 
receiving
 a pretty pink piece of paper :-P
 

Thanks again for the feedback and suggestions everyone.
 
Geoff

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:46 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 

Another option involves user interaction. On a new message or a reply type the 
name explicitly, do not let autocomplete do it's thing; click the X in the 
little
 window that pops up. Then remove the now-identified bad address from the 
Address Book. Yeah, I know, getting users to reliably perform steps is not 
reliable.




From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:33:05 +0000

Okay, what’s odd is we have FIM synchronizing the GAL in both locations (which 
populates the x500 addresses). We had to add them on the company2.com mailboxes
 so users could reply/forward internal emails pre-dating the migration. I’ll 
have to see if FIM syncs that data, as I am pretty confident it does. But if 
it’s a matter of updating the Mail Contacts on company1.com to include that 
info, we should be able to
 handle that.
 

Thank you everyone. Very sincerely appreciated.
-Geoff

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:16 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
You should be able to add contract records for them, and then add X500 address 
objects to the contacts.
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:05 AM

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
Excuse my lack of clarity, I misused some terminology I think. "Quick Contacts" 
was meant to be "Address Book Cache" or "Cached Address Book" from what I'm 
seeing it described as online.
 Sorry for any confusion.
 
We did use NirSoft NK2 Editor for the "company2.com" destination side of 
things. So if User1 migrated from "company1.com" to "company2.com" we modified 
their AutoStream.dat file so they have
 all their Address Book cache, etc. The problem is for users at "company1.com", 
their Address Book Cache has the user's old information (from when they were 
housed on company1.com Exchange servers). The problem is while there are only 
~20 users in Company 2,
 our company has ~3,000 users and I don’t know of a way to script the removal 
of these addresses from users’ Address Book Cache.
 
So again, our issue is that we migrated users from our Exchange server to their 
own. Now our users are unable to reply/forward to emails prior to the migration 
or send to the users from their
 Address Book Cache for ‘company2.com’ email addresses. I’m wondering if there 
is anything we can do on our Exchange server to point those ~20 addresses so 
replying/forwarding those old emails will still resolve and send successfully 
to their own Exchange server.
 I didn’t think there was anything we could do on the source domain side 
(outside of modifying Address Book Cache on a user-by-user basis). But I know 
there is a fair number of people that are a lot smarter than me on here, so 
wanted to pick their brains before
 I fall back on the advisory email/instructions we have already sent out.
 

Thanks,
Geoff

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Gavin Wilby

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 1:27 AM

To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 
We use Nirsoft’s NK2 editor for this, it takes a second to load and then delete 
the old contacts off the machines in one swoop.
 
(ignore the name is NK2, it works with all version’s of Outlook).
 

Gavin Wilby
IT Support Engineer

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault

Sent: 15 September 2014 23:20

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [Exchange] Server Migration: Quick Contacts Failing


 

By your description a "quick contact" is an Outlook-local contact. It's failing 
for the reason you note and, more importantly, will _never_ look to the server 
to re-resolve this
 address. Outlook contacts are locally-managed only; no server-side fix.


Since there are so few re-create them properly on the server and continue to 
have users delete them as the problem comes up.




On Sep 15, 2014, at 14:11, "Orlebeck, Geoffrey" <[email protected]> 
wrote:



All:
 
We performed a migration where we took a domain that was previously hosted on 
our company’s Exchange server (Company1.com)
 and migrated them to their own AD/Exchange environment (company2.com).

 
We migrated the x500 addresses from when Company 2 was on our network so
company2.com so users could reply/forward internal email (or use quick 
contacts) without issue. The problem is that users in our Org (company1.com) 
have quick
 contacts pointing to the x500 address information from when 
company2.com was still hosted on our (company1.com) Exchange servers. Now that 
Company 2 is “external” these emails fail (which we would expect). We sent out 
an advisory email and whenever a user calls,
 we’ve shown them how to delete the quick contact and add user from Global 
Address List (we have FIM 2010 running GALSync) and emails work.

 
There are only ~20 addresses for
company2.com, so if we can manually update the proxyAddress attribute or 
something else, that’s fine. But we’re a little unsure on how to allow
company1.com to accept the old x500 address and still forward it out to
company2.com
 
Here’s the network details in case it helps:
*Exchange 2010 SP3 on both sides
*Two-way Forest trust established
*FIM 2010 running GALSync w/ Cross-Forest Delegation to sync GAL and allow 
delegation w/in Outlook
*Both Forests are housed in our datacenter, so while they are separated, they 
can be hit via internal IPs w/o traversing WAN
 
Thank you for your time.
 
-Geoff
 
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical
 privacy statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you 
are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of 
this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in 
error, please accept our
 apologies and notify the sender. Thank you. 


SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited and SMP Fund Services Limited are 
licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision Commission. SMP Accounting & 
Tax
 Limited is a member of the ICAEW Practice Assurance Scheme.
SMP Partners Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration No: 
000908V

Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, P.N. Eckersley, S.E McGowan, O. Peck, 
J.J. Scott, S.J. Turner
SMP Trustees Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration No: 
068396C

Directors: A.C. Baggesen, M.W. Denton, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, J. Watterson, J. 
Cubbon
SMP Fund Services Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration 
No: 120288C

Directors: V. Campbell, M.W. Denton, P.N. Eckersley, D.A. Manser, S.E McGowan, 
O. Peck, J.J. Scott, R.K. Corkill
SMP Accounting & Tax Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company 
Registration No: 001316V

Directors: I.F. Begley,  A.J. Dowling, P. Duchars, P.N. Eckersley, J.J. Scott, 
S.J. Turner
SMP Capital Markets Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company Registration 
No: 002438V

Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, D.F Hudson, S.E McGowan, O. Peck, J.J. 
Scott.
SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited, SMP Fund Services Limited, SMP 
Accounting & Tax Limited and SMP Capital Markets Limited are members of the SMP 
Partners
 Group of Companies.
 
This email is confidential and is subject to disclaimers. Details can be found 
at:
http://www.smppartners.com/disclaimer.html


______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit 
http://www.symanteccloud.com

______________________________________________________________________
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy statutes.
 They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the 
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, 
please accept our apologies and notify
 the sender. Thank you. 

Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected
 by state and federal medical privacy statutes. They are intended only for the 
use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
received this transmission
 in error, please accept our apologies and notify the sender. Thank you.



Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended
 only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please accept our 
apologies and notify the sender. Thank
 you.                                     

Reply via email to