Well, that's definitely true. eDiscovery in EX2010 sucks, and that's being kind. I was hoping they have improved it in EX2013 as claimed. We are now on EX2013 but I haven't gotten around to checking/testing eDiscovery yet.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > This is MY OPINION. I personally think the storage and search > capabilities of Exchange for *discovery* are underdeveloped. Exchange > eDiscovery is an 80% solution. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9 > *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 6:49 PM > *To:* exchange > *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] Jounaling > > > > Any well-known or obvious reason that I'm not aware of? Or is this > another one of those scenarios where Exchange CAN do this, but not REALLY? > Just MS checking another box off the list.... > > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would recommend you look at 3rd party solutions. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *ccollins9 > *Sent:* Thursday, November 13, 2014 6:30 PM > *To:* exchange > *Subject:* [Exchange] Jounaling > > > > We are embarking on a "journal everything" adventure and I was wondering > who out there has been doing this in a medium to large organization and the > resources or strategies you employed. I couldn't imagine sending > everything to a single journal mailbox due to database load and size etc. > So I was thinking of maybe using powershell to create a journaling MBX for > each user with an associated rule. > > > > Journaling everything comes from the tippy top, so there's no real room > for me to argue against it. > > >
