Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]:
1.  You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange
server[2]?  Generally considered A Bad Idea.
2.  Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing
the problems?  It's generally considered a logical fallacy to put the
burden of the argument on proof of a negative.  i.e.  Prove that
breathing DOESN'T cause cancer...  You can't.   Everyone who ever caught
cancer has drawn breath.  You can't have a valid control group until
they back off their unreasonable stance.

-tom

[1] But in case one of them does, can I have a floor wax[3] gift
certificate?[4]
[2] "... when I open this room from the server where we configured the
script..."
[3] New Shimmer!  It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping!
[4] Mike, I hope you have a Ben & Jerry's one for me. They feed ya this
Blue Bell stuff in Texas...ewww

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 03:19 PM
> Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
> Conversation: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training.  
> This has been a
> pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it 
> until we can
> prove that the script isn't causing all the problems.  And 
> why would this
> affect only this one room and not the other 49?  I know users 
> who look at
> the calendar this way on the other rooms and this is the only 
> room that we
> see mismatched meetings between the server and the client.
> 
> I have also created a brand new profile for this room on my 
> workstation and
> opened the room on my workstation and I see exactly what we 
> see when we do
> file, open other user's.  The place that it is wrong is when 
> I open this
> room from the server where we configured the script, and this 
> view is where
> the requests are determined if they are accepted or not.  So 
> the meetings
> aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get 
> booked for the
> same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client.
> 
> Diane
> 
> Diane Boehm
> SC Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: FW: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> FYI Don't let the users open the rooms using file -> open -> 
> other users
> folder. This can corrupt the f/b time on the mailbox/room.
> 
> 
> Michael Semiglia
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:47 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> We have run /cleanfreebusy on this room almost every day 
> since Feb. and it
> hasn't fixed it.  Nothing else has changed and all the rooms 
> are configured
> the same on this one server.  Anything else anyone can think of????  
> 
> Diane
> 
> Diane Boehm
> SC Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1.262.260.5330
> 
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to
> behavioral problems" - Ed Crowley, Compaq
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:40 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> Every once in a while I've had to open up the conference room 
> mail box with
> the /cleanfreebusy switch. It usually cures similar problems. 
> On one very
> rare occasion, I had to completely remove and reinstall the Autoaccept
> script-- I forget the details on why, though. It might have 
> been around the
> time I switched servers and I didn't add the perms to the 
> event service
> folder.
> 
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> Since we are on the topic of the auto accept script, has 
> anyone see this
> issue while using the script.  
> 
> We have one room, out of 50, that when a client booking the 
> room opens the
> calendar using file, open other user's, sees the meetings 
> that have been
> booked.  But when the calendar is opened on the server, the 
> same location we
> used to configure the auto accept script for this room, we 
> see only a few of
> the meetings that have been booked for the room.  What then 
> happens is a
> client will book the room and the meeting will be accepted 
> and will never
> appear on the calendar on the server, so another client books 
> the room for
> the same time as the first client, and they are both 
> accepted.  Because the
> free/busy isn't updated for 15 minutes, there could be 
> clients seeing that
> the room is open when it really isn't and book the room and 
> the meeting gets
> accepted anyway.  
> 
> I just want to know if anyone else has seen this problem.  Is 
> anyone else
> out there that has 4500 clients in one site, multiple servers 
> with at least
> 50 conference rooms set up to use auto accept?  If anyone has 
> sound advice
> to fix this or a workaround until we can get it fixed, it 
> would be greatly
> appreciated.  TIA
> 
> 
> Diane
> 
> Diane Boehm
> SC Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1.262.260.5330
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> I don't know why you would want to do without it... it's easy 
> enough to
> configure, it has the patented Ronco "Set it and forget it!" 
> feature set,
> and achieves the functionality that you want. I've been 
> running it for a
> couple of years here, with very few problems. Many others on 
> the list (with
> a couple of exceptions) are doing the same thing. It really 
> is the simplest
> way to accomplish what you are going after.
> 
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> 
> This has been a (non-)paid advertisement for the Auto Accept script!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curry, Kristin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:28 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> Thanks Mike - I realize that was an option but was hoping to 
> do without!!
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:05 AM
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:      RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & 
> permissions
> 
> We use the AutoAccept script at www.exchangecode.com. Works 
> like a champ,
> and allows us to set the calendar permissions for the 
> conference rooms to
> read only for users.
> 
> Mike Morrison
> NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator
> Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curry, Kristin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:55 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 & permissions
> 
> 
> 
> Quick question regarding permissions and direct booking Conference
> Room/Resources with Outlook 2000:
> 
>       Outlook 2000 requires Author permissions on the 
> Resource Calendar to
> do direct booking.  This part works great.  But with Author 
> permissions,
> they can also still use File, Open Special to book a meeting on top of
> another meeting - resulting in conflicts & double-bookings.  
> Yikes!   So..I
> thought I'd take off the "View" permissions but then users 
> can't at least
> see the meetings are already booked in the room other than just the
> free/busy.  
> 
>       So...how are you configured to Direct Book conf. Rooms. 
> with Outlook
> 2000 without compromising permissions (and double-bookings)?  
> Or do you
> still use the notorious "Delegate" mailbox that auto accepts 
> instead of
> direct-booking?
> 
>       Thanks for any ideas!
>       Kristin
> 
>       
>       Kristin Curry
>       Systems Engineer, MCSE
>       Enterprise Server Group - Best Buy Co., Inc.
>       Direct:  952-324-0787
>       E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to