Agreed.  Why have hamburger when you can have a nice thick slab of roast
beast.  Scanmail is far more Admin friendly as comared to NAV for MSX.

> ----------
> From:         John Matteson
> Reply To:     Exchange Discussions
> Sent:         Friday, December 28, 2001 11:40
> To:   Exchange Discussions
> Subject:      RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
> 
> If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to
> Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going
> to
> get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on.
> 
> John Matteson; Exchange Manager
> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
> (404) 239 - 2981
> 
> With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground
> round....
> Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have
> Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot
> down
> on this and fight it all the way to the top.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company
> anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also
> told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). 
> Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker
> when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as
> I
> did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking
> what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was
> chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for
> Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all
> would know best. 
> Thanks!
> Ron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to