Agreed. Why have hamburger when you can have a nice thick slab of roast beast. Scanmail is far more Admin friendly as comared to NAV for MSX.
> ---------- > From: John Matteson > Reply To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:40 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 > > If you have Scanmail on your servers now, it makes no sense to change to > Groupsucks. As Martin has told you, you got good stuff now, you're going > to > get rotten stuff if management keeps on keeping on. > > John Matteson; Exchange Manager > Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > (404) 239 - 2981 > > With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. - RFC 1925 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:31 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange 5.5 > > > Going from Scanmail to NAV is like going from Prime Rib to ground > round.... > Your company will be very sorry it made this move. Since you already have > Scanmail, there is no reason to dump it. I would SERIOUSLY put my foot > down > on this and fight it all the way to the top. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ron Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 9:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: NAV for Exchange 5.5 > > > Hi Folks, > I just found out we are going with The Norton Solution for our company > anti-virus protection. This is fine for server and client, but I was also > told we would be using NAV's solution for Exchange. (Groupware I think). > Since I was not involved in this decision, but was the sole decision maker > when I chose Scanmail...im not too happy. But...I turn to y'all again, as > I > did a few years ago for info on the best AV solution. This time I'm asking > what kind of problems will I see with this new NAV scan engine that was > chosen for MY Email servers? Is the NAV a solid, non-flaky product for > Exchange? I couldn't really find anything major from the net..but y'all > would know best. > Thanks! > Ron > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]