I'm not sure I see that as a major limitation. The point of the vault (in most cases) is to archive historical data. Active data should still be in the store. It's really very seldom (like never) that I want to pull a message up on my <handheld of choice> that's more than a couple days old. If I do run across something that looks like it might be useful, I have a way to save it in the "active" data. I do search through year old data sitting at my desk occasionally, and for that the vault works fine.
If the <handheld of choice> has a full wireless web interface then it should be able to access the data either way. -----Original Message----- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, June 07, 2002 4:00 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Email Archiving Subject: RE: Email Archiving Steve, With KVS there is one major problem, it is with mobile users as the offline/Palm pilots etc; only stores the short-cut not the original Email (the next version 3.8 should hopefully have offline vault to overcome this, but still not for palm pilots, etc;) so they cannot be read. N.B. But KVS WILL SIS PST's that are migrated back in the same store which quite a lot of the others don't. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everybody agrees you should have one, but no one wants to use yours -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Email Archiving I am currently testing two email archiving solutions for Exchange 5.5 /2000. K Vault by KVS & Exchange Archive Solution (EAS) which were the only products, that I could find, that meet our criteria. The main criteria are single instance storage, compression of the archive, pst migration tool so we can eliminate psts, and a simple user interface within Outlook. This eliminates a lot of products, IXOS, C2C Archive One, EmailXtender, Veritas, etc We also want to be able to utilize a SAN for the archive store for 9 exchange servers. Some of the access to the archive store on the SAN will be across small WAN links (128 - 512). I'm wondering whether anyone has had any experience with these products or similar products that meet our criteria and what your thoughts / recommendations on them are. I am particularly interested in any bad experiences with KVS or EAS. Thanks Steve _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************ *********************** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) ************************************************************************ *********************** _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
