Undocumented limitation? Unlikely. Exchange advice from someone woefully incompetent. Undoubtedly. Have you been taking Exchange advice from Amit?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:36 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > Hello. > > I have been told that Exchange 5.5 with IS bigger than 50G > is VERY bad. It means there is big chance the IS won't start > after restart..... > > I am wondering if this is true, meaning, this is an > undocument limitation, and should I be afraid to have IS > above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong > and acts very fast.... > > Thanks for your time! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Scharff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users > > between databases SIS is maintained on a per database > basis. When, how > > and where > you > > should opt for additional servers, databases or storage > groups is not > > a universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the > > information you've provided there is no "right" answer. I know of > > organizations with significantly larger databases than > 70GB, whether > > or > not > > that is appropriate for the organization you are working with is > impossible > > to say at this point. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:11 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > I think I am missing something. > > > > > > As far as I understand, if I install second exchange > server in the > > > site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to > that server, I > > > will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 > > > mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will > > > have 2 instance of the same message. > > > > > > Am I right? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Couch, Nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > I vote for two servers. > > > > > > > > Nate Couch > > > > EDS Messaging > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > From: Great Cthulhu Jones > > > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need > > > > > two > > > servers. > > > > > If not, buy more hard drives. > > > > > > > > > > (:= > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Sakti > > > > > Chakravarty (Senteq) > > > > > Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains > > > > > SIS. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: IS 70GB and growing.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > > > > > I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is > over 73GB > > > > > (total > > > of > > > > > 500 users). > > > > > I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box > > > > > into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose > > > > > SIS....... On the other hand, I will have two smaller > databases. > > > > > > > > > > I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I > > > would like to > > > hear > > > > > your opinions. > > > > > In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to > > > EMC box in 3 > > > > > months (part of storage project). > > > > > > > > > > I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such > > > big IS (are > > > > > there?!) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
