Um, no.  Even though I am the Lan Manager for my company, I have not been given 
permission to go rifling through the payroll documents or the CEO's email.  I have the 
ability to recover docs when necessary, and look at stuff when told to, but being made 
an Admin does NOT give me ANY implicit trusts.  The only tasks I do are ones that I 
have been specifically given.  Since my boss has not told me to monitor employees' 
mail for specific kinds of newsletters, I am not allowed to do so, and if I did, I 
could (rightly) be fired.

If it's specifically written down, then it's not implied.  there is a difference.  
www.dictionary.com?

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


That's not true.  As an Mail Administrator/Engineer, whatever you want to call 
yourself, there is implicit trust that you will not abuse your power to be able to 
view EVERYONE's email, due to the confidentiality of, oh say, the CEO or CFO.  You 
have the power to view payroll and accounting documents. But as a Mail Administrator, 
it is a position of high sensitivity.  Highly sensitive documents are passed through 
the mail system.  You are expected not to sit down one afternoon and see what your 
boss or some other manager has been sending emails out about.  It may not be written 
in some companies, but it is written in others.  And I learned that the more you stay 
out of people's business, the more they will trust you not to look at sensitive 
documents.

G�off.......



-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


that's not necessarily true.  Unless he's been told to do it (which it appears he 
has), he doesn't have some sort of implicit right to do it.  He has to be tasked with 
it.

Drew Nicholson
Technical Writer
Network Engineer
LAN Manager
RapidApp
312-372-7188 (work)
312-543-0008 (cell)
Born To Edit


-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


Rachel:  As an Exchange Administrator, he has the right to browse ANYONE's mail.  That 
mail belongs to the Company, so there shouldn't be anything in there that an enduser 
would be afraid of someone else seeing.  Remember -- the email is on Company's 
equipment, software, etc.  It is THEIRS.

G�off.......


-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Blocking a newsletter


>From my point of view:
If no one has asked you to monitor content and provided a written order, what are you 
doing browsing someone else' mail? Its bad form, and can get you fired. If you have 
been told to monitor then just enforce what is normally enforced. Don't ask the end 
user. They will talk you into an exception, and that one exception will become a chink 
in your armour that will be used and abused by everyone.

I wasn't going to to register my opinion on this one, but I must tell you, taking 
advice from Hummert is a bad idea. Whatever you do, don't do it because Hummert says 
so. I (shudder) have seen the places Hummert considers normal and it makes me want to 
scrub off the top 2 layers of my skin. Sincerly,

Rachel

-----Original Message-----
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Blocking a newsletter


Via Scanmail I find that a user is subscribed (or appears to be) to the 
f^ckedcompany.com newsletter.  Besides the domain name there is other profanity in the 
newsletter.  So do I follow company policy or let it slide? My gut reaction is to ask 
the person if they are subscribed and then politely ask them to unsubscribe and not 
have this kind of thing sent to a work address.

Jim Liddil

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to