Its hard to tell what you are talking about. Every time someone says something you
can't refute, you change your arguement slightly. You talk about ethics and yet you
throw around wild accusations about others while not even managing to stick to the
generally accepted ground rules for debate.
Which reminds me: I asked you earlier what "Secret Direct Compensation" my fellow MVPs
and I are supposed to receive from Microsoft. I'm still waiting for my reply.
Rob
MS MVP.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 19:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This is exactly the attitude that I am talking about.
.+-��-�xm����,�)�r����(����\����ـ��b��!���0�
���&�ȭzǚ����r��:.�˛���m隊[h��y�\���z[,�)�r����Z����Zvh��+-i٢��2�G( - RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Martin Blackstone
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Joshua R. Morgan
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Rachel Pickens
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Martin Blackstone
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Martin Blackstone
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Parrett, Sue
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Robert Moir
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Mellott, Bill
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Woodruff, Michael
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Gregory Householder
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects East, Bill
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Ben Schorr
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Greg Deckler
- RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Ben Schorr

