No way of checking whether recipient has clicked link. 
Problem if user is off line. 
>From a legal perspective if you do this you have to add text saying that it
you don't click the link to see what it says, then you shouldn't have read
the message, which is as much a problem as the disclaimer in the first
place.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 18 June 2003 22:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Brick level backups


Why not put a link as the disclaimer? E.g.:

<signature>
Steve Molkentin
BSES
Phone, fax,etc
http://www.bses.org.au/legal.html (there is no link here, just an
example)
</signature>

I just thought this might save 50 lines of crap in an e-mail... The person
has been made aware of the legality of the document through the link...

What do you think? Pointless? Saves rubbish in e-mails!  ;)

themolk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2003 11:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Brick level backups
> 
> 
> That's not funny !! I'm currently involved in discussions
> with our legal team regarding the validity of English 
> language disclaimers on messages written in various different 
> European languages (we route all our Internet mail through a 
> single SMTP gateway in the UK). The legal team are pushing to 
> add disclaimers in each language.
> 
> Just because no-one ever reads disclaimers doesn't mean that
> they are not legally applicable - when was the last time you 
> read the MS license agreement when installing software? And 
> just because I select the other radio button and click OK 
> doesn't mean that I have read the labels attached to those 
> actions either.
> 
> I would be interested in Williams disclaimer list if he would
> be happy to publish.
> 
> Also, does anyone know of a disclaimer adder that is language
> aware? Otherwise I'm going to have to do some funny tricks 
> with SMTP connectors and routing inside the company.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2003 12:21
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Brick level backups
> 
> 
> That's ok some company will make a 3rd party app I am sure,
> that will force 
> you to read or click ok before you actually get to see the 
> email. Hopefully 
> that won't happen. Probably has just haven't seen it yet.
> 
> 
> From: "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Brick level backups
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:55:46 +0100
> 
> 1: Nobody ever reads them
> 
> 2: Nobody ever reads them
> 
> 3: People read the message, and forget to read the disclaimer
> 
> 4: go to 1
> 
> Phil
> 
> ---------------------------------------------
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
> 
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > Sent: 18 June 2003 12:54
>  > To: Exchange Discussions
>  > Subject: RE: Brick level backups
>  >
>  >
>  > You  have one like this for disclaimers. I know the basics  > why 
> not. I would  > like to see your reasons of why disclaimers are bad.
>  >
>  >
>  > From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > Reply-To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  > Subject: RE: Brick level backups
>  > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:19:25 -0700
>  >
>  > I probably should reread this, but thwas my answer to this 
> question  > A year ago - plus an added point.  >  > Why not 
> to do Brick Level Backups:  >
> > 1) They take a loooong time. At my last position, the priv.edb on  >
> several Exchange servers was huge with several mailboxes
> exceeding  > 2GB. Backup windows of 'July' is not acceptible 
> nor necessary.  >  > 2) Brick Level break SIS in the process. 
> At a previous employer we  > had an SIS ratio of 4 (lots of 
> little daily cash spreadsheets and the  > like getting sent 
> to DL's). This means that a BLB backup uses as much  > as 4 
> times the total tape. Now I need an autoloader to take care 
> of  > the boxes of tapes required each night.  >  > 3) You 
> can't perform a full server restore to point of failure with  
> > brick level backups. You have to actually perform
> additional full  > online backups as well to allow for full
> disaster recovery. More  > tapes. More time. More money.  >  
> > 4) A restore of several mailboxes from BLB's will cause the
> store to  > grow because of no SIS. If my SIS ratio is 2 and
> some disaster leaves  > me with only brick-level, my restore 
> will double the size of the priv.  >  > 5) The redundant 
> backups for brick level lower the overall performance  > of 
> your exchange server as backups compete with users for CPU 
> cycles  > and disk reads. It is also additional and 
> unnecessary wear and tear  > on tape drives.  >  > 6) Brick 
> Level Backups do not backup items in deleted item retention.  
> > As my users (for email anyway) have always been of the
> educated  > variety, they know and use deleted item recovery
> as needed.  >
> > 7) A restore of a mailbox is seldom needed. (Probably the only  >
> > instance
> is inadvertant deletion by an administrator in Exchange5.5)
> > With deleted item retention set to a reasonable 30 days or
> so, and  > with deleted mailboxes retained in Exchange2000,
> brick level backups  > fall in the category of a waste of 
> time and resources.  >  > 8) Backups should not be a helpdesk 
> support option. They are a  > disaster recovery requirement. 
> With all that tape and time, the  > convenience of having 
> someone restore my mailbox is so simple I can be  > more 
> careless with my email. I can always get my info restored.  
> The  > Potential for user complacency because we can always 
> restore uses  > Valuable IT time and resources.  >  > 9) Yes, 
> it's true. For me, I have only done this using ArcServeIT.  > 
> Because of comments here in this and other forums, CA took 
> the  > Exchange agent back to the lab and did some more 
> fixing on it. For me  > it was too little too late. 
> Basically, BLB's are not perfect. Data  > is not perfectly 
> recreated through the restore process. Problems  > included 
> header info missing, digitally signed emails corrupt,  > 
> attachments missing.  >  > 10) Many, many more reputable and 
> experienced people have shared their  > horror stories over 
> and over in this and other forums and newsgroups.  > So much 
> so that I was relieved to learn in 1998 that it wasn't just 
> me  > that felt this way. The people that have expressed this 
> opinion I  > hold in high regard and certainly owe it to 
> myself to try to  > understand why the concensus is for or 
> against something.  >  > 11) Microsoft provides the utility 
> ExMerge which can be used to backup  > a single mailbox to 
> .pst if necessary. I use this as the last step  > before 
> deleting a users mailbox after (s)he have left the company. 
> It  > is a simplified, granular alternative for certain 
> circumstances.  >  > 12) Exchange2003 allows for a disaster 
> recovery storage group to allow  > Production restores 
> without a recovery server.  >  > The above may not all apply 
> to you.  >  > Would you like to see the list against the use 
> of 'confidentiality  > disclaimers'?  >  > William  >  >  >  
> > -----Original Message-----  > From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Lloyd  >
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:58 AM  > To: Exchange 
> Discussions  >  > Hi guys,  > I just wanted to know why are 
> brick level backups a bad idea.  > I know why pst  > files 
> are.  > I can only imagine is that they take forever to 
> complete, and  > not always all  > of them.  >  > Sorry if 
> this has been discussed before but i do need some  > 
> reasoning for my  > bosses.  >  > I know Ed hate em  >  >  > 
> Thnks  >  > David  >  >  > CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE  > This 
> communication contains useless information which is  > 
> confidential and
> > may also be naughty. It is for the exclusive use of the intended  >
> recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient please  >
> note that any
> > distribution, copying or use of this communication or the  >
> > information
> in it  > is strictly prohibited. If you received this
> communication in  > error, please  > notify us by e-mail or 
> by telephone (020 7770 7000) and then  > delete the  > e-mail 
> and any copies of it.  >  >  >  > 
> _________________________________________________________________
>  > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
>  > Web Interface:
>  > http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang=english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months
> FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
> ext_mode=&lang
> =english
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Web Interface:
> http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&t
ext_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


**********************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail 
in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail 
and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised 
disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is 
prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are 
those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, 
and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. 
The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss 
or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors 
or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its
transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of
Business, 
a copy of which can be obtained on request.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&;
lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang
=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


**********************************************************************
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential 
to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail 
in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail 
and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised 
disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is 
prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are 
those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, 
and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. 
The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss 
or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors 
or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission.
This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, 
a copy of which can be obtained on request.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: 
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to