I totally appreciate Paul's point of not wanting another potential delay that you can't control imposed but the data security aspect I don't understand. Email, if unencrypted, is insecure.
If you are emailing something unencrypted outside your organisation you should assume it is public knowledge. I really don't see that adding another handler makes any difference at all. It is by definition no longer "Company Insider" if you've sent it outside the company. Noone was suggesting that mail between internal sites should be routed through this sort of service (Were they? Does anyone really have an internal Spam problem?) -----Original Message----- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 December 2003 15:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outsourcing email? Why would you want the control of your un-encrypted, completely open to reading, mission critical, company insider information, mail left to someone outside your control? Do yourself a great big favor by keeping it in house. The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchange&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
