Gah. Wrote "Blue Shiva;" should be "Blue Vishnu/Indra," as below:
--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > (one small snip for a man; one giant snip for Mankind.) > > > Now: as this model shows the movement entirely one way, from the > > bottom up, I believe it is only half the picture: the time-flow of > > Prakriti. It appears that from Purusha's point of view, time flows > > in reverse. Spirit and Matter are one -- the same substance -- > just > > polar opposites in Time-space-flow. > > This didn't ring completely right, and on closer look I remember > that the inward, upward flow within the torus-Hiranyagarbha from > Sattva to Rajas to Tamas (i.e., Blue Vishnu/Indra funneling into Yellow > point-Brahma and funneling out to Red Rudra/Shiva) described above IS > Purusha, the inner core or Spirit-flow of Wholeness, whereas the > emergence of the Wholeness out the top of Red Shiva/Rudra and > flowing out and around the Golden body of the sphere down into Blue > Vishnu/Indra again, from Tamas to Rajas to Sattva, IS Prakriti, the > Matter-flow aspect of Wholeness. Thus we have the reverse currents > of Spirit and Matter flowing simultaneously, depending on whether > one looks "inside" or "outside." One is empty up one's middle (the > hollow core of the torus), but the double-cone or chalice of inner > Purusha does flow up and out to form a fine "skin" of outer Prakriti > (the outer film of the torus), though again inside (as well as > outside) this skin is only nothing. > > Again, in my experience anyhow all of this is viewed even this > clearly (FWIW) only AFTER one has fully completed one's first run- > through. When we are still "inside" this process it is MUCH less > obvious what exactly is going on. > > Beyond or other than this Purusha-Prakriti, as far as I can see at > this point, anyhow, there is nothing. I have found nothing "new" in > the 15 years or so since M.C. first revealed itself -- but going > back into the whole thing repeatedly over the years has revealed > much more refinement of detail and Self-Knowledge within this form. > > Along these same lines: what Shannon has written is absolutely > correct -- other than Brahman, all the states of consciousness are > merely delusions or maya or ego. I wrote this myself a few days back > when trying to verify and clarify (what a laugh) some people's > Understanding of paradoxical-Brahman. On the other hand (and there > is ALWAYS an other hand in Brahman *lol*), knowing all this is THAT > *can* unfold the realization that since this is true, even the ego > must be THAT; even maya must be THAT, and thus the question: How > does THAT imagine the so-called relative into existence? From this > come the further unfoldments of K.C., S.C., and M.C. -- all still > simply Brahman, yet now Brahman examining the process of looking at > itself; Brahman exploring its apparent dimensional play; Brahman > with a "twist." > > But there is always a choice as to whether one wishes to unfold > further comprehension of maya or Mastery, or simply to remain in > undifferentiated THAT. Wholeness supports either choice. > > In fact, this brings up a really interesting point -- Wholeness > whole-heartedly supports ALL the states of consciousness -- this is > why each one feels so self-sufficient. There is absolutely nothing > which says one HAS to move right along from T.C. to C.C. to G.C. to > U.C. and so forth. The apparent movement or growth from one to the > other is an illusion anyhow -- just a matter of our abstracting the > relevant information we need out of the "bloomin' confusion," or all- > inclusive paradox that we are, to support our current state of > consciousness. We "move right along in" -- or pay attention to -- > apparent progress and growth until we intuitively feel we are done. > At that point, we have found our right place for this time, and are > serving our perfect part in the greater whole -- which whether we > choose to know it or not, is just ourselves also. All aboard the > Hiranyagarbha! (It's the best free-ride in RoryLand.) :-) > > Also, if we are to view Brahman-Consciousness as the "real" C.C., > and Krishna-Consciousness as the "real" G.C., and Shiva- > Consciousness as the "real" Unity, and Maharishi-Consciousness as > the "real" Brahman, then what we had known as T.C. would be "real" > coma; C.C. would be "real" sleep; G.C. would be "real" dreaming, > U.C. would be "real" waking state. From the point of view of > Brahman, anyhow, this is as good a view as any, albeit a bit > confusing perhaps for those playing at ignorance that all this is > THAT. > > LLL, > R. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
