--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sandiego108" > <sandiego108@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. > > > > > > > > > > And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in > your > > > > > estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* > > > > > enlightened... > > > > > > > > > > do you try to *act* enlightened? > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't have to. > > > > > > > > > As always Turq, clear as a bell. > > > > > > I thought so. :-) > > > > I don't claim to be enlightened the way Jimbo > > does, so why would I try to act enlightened? > > You claim a different enlightenment than Jim Flanegin since you said > we all are enlightened anyway. I see, tapas not necessary. > Cheers ! ;-) >
I'm curious, does every thread on this forum tend to degrade like this? This forum is all about the people who belong to it .. :)
