--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <sandiego108@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. > > > > > > > > And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in your > > > > estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* > > > > enlightened... > > > > > > > > do you try to *act* enlightened? > > > > > > > > > I don't have to. > > > > > > As always Turq, clear as a bell. > > > I thought so. :-) > > I don't claim to be enlightened the way Jimbo > does, so why would I try to act enlightened?
You claim a different enlightenment than Jim Flanegin since you said we all are enlightened anyway. I see, tapas not necessary. Cheers ! ;-)
