--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <sandiego108@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "sandiego108"
> > <sandiego108@>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB
<no_reply@>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip.
> > > > >
> > > > > And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people
in
> > your
> > > > > estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act*
> > > enlightened...
> > > > >
> > > > > do you try to *act* enlightened?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I don't have to.
> > >
> > >
> > > As always Turq, clear as a bell.
> > >
> > the Tur*quoise B**** thinking goes something like this:
> >
> > Everyone is enlightened, but they don't know it, although those
> that
> > claim to be enlightened are like everyone else, however, TB
knows
> > who is enlightened by the way they express themselves, and yet
TB
> is
> > like everyone else, but isn't enlightened, but realizes his
> > enlightenment, unless he changes his mind, in which case all of
the
> > above is moot.
> >
> > Some would call this "crazy wisdom", and others would just call
it
> > crazy...:-)
>
> Or the excuse "buddhists" use for not having to do tapas. Reading
> books and plenty of cheap vino will do. ;-)
>
en-lite-tenment vs. enlightenment...:-)
