--- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sandiego108" > <sandiego108@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > this sounds like a fantasy on your part- an ego trip. > > > > > > > > And it still doesn't explain your insistence that people in > your > > > > estimation aren't enlightened because they don't *act* > > enlightened... > > > > > > > > do you try to *act* enlightened? > > > > > > > > I don't have to. > > > > > > As always Turq, clear as a bell. > > > the Tur*quoise B**** thinking goes something like this: > > Everyone is enlightened, but they don't know it, although those that > claim to be enlightened are like everyone else, however, TB knows > who is enlightened by the way they express themselves, and yet TB is > like everyone else, but isn't enlightened, but realizes his > enlightenment, unless he changes his mind, in which case all of the > above is moot. > > Some would call this "crazy wisdom", and others would just call it > crazy...:-)
Or the excuse "buddhists" use for not having to do tapas. Reading books and plenty of cheap vino will do. ;-)
