It's interesting how each point of view has an explanation for how the 
other is entirely wrong. Vaj's pov states that techniques that 
transcend thought are of limited value.

Maharishi's pov as expressed in the sci lesson on "consideration of 
other systems" was that: Any system that transcends its own activity 
is Transcendental Meditation; any system that does not is not being 
worthy of being called a system."

Funny, the difference.

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Work in the context I used it was meant to be "to accomplish, 
achieve; 
> to cause, produce" NOT "To produce or cause by continued application 
of 
> physical [or mental] force".  Why was that not obvious? Am I being 
> unclear? If so, I apologize.
> 
> Therefore "achieve transcendence of thought" would be a way to say 
what 
> was intended--although I'm sure there's a way to semantically twist 
> that if that's the game you wish to play!
> 
> On Jun 9, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Rick wrote:
> 
> > I think the key word is "work"; "forms of meditation that work at
> > transcending thought by their very nature bind one to thought".





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to