Everything that is "relative" is associated with the ego. The ego does not and cannot love. The ego is based in seperateness, and it's "job" is to continue the illusion of seperateness.
On the other hand, the "absolute" is the soul. Pure consiousness is the experience or one's own soul. The light and energy of the soul behind all experience.
The soul is love. It's intension to manifest here on earth was the intension of love.
The more integrated the soul becomes in the body, the more one radiates love.
Anytime one is not loving, we can be sure the ego is in charge.
That is why it is so hard to get people to meditate.
Because all advertisement appeals to ego.
How do you advertise something that will eventually destroy the ego, and make it irrevelant.
Even the so-called false advertisement for the 'flying technique' is all ego based.
It's a catch 22...

Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- In [email protected], "claudiouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>snip>
>
> Is such enlightenment still "relative" then, and is there another
> more profound level to reach in which truly one would experience
> everything as the Self, this Self being truly INTIMATELY cognissant
> of the egos and bodies of ALL creatures? Because only THEN it
becomes
> possible to love one's neighbour as one's Self AND have the sense
> that a wrong done to another is truly a wrong done to one's "self"
as
> well.

Can't say as it is more profound particularly, but it's been my
experience that intimacy with the egos and physiologies of others as
and in this bodymind certainly becomes available as other aspects of
oneself.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'



Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to