<Was Sirhan a Manchurian Candidate? No, that title> fits Obama.> So who is hypnotizing Obama to carry out a murder on a plitical leader? Did you see the movie? Do you know what this phrase means? Are you no just flinging any feces within reach now Raunchy?
I look forward to you contributions after the election Raunchy. I dig your prolific posting energy and hope you are not a one trick, election only poster here. But you are really losing me on these irrational attacks on Obama. They don't even make any sense. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > Hannity was 7 years old when RFK was killed and > > around 13 when Ayers's book was "published" (in > > quotes because it appears to have been privately > > printed, which would be why it wasn't in the NY > > Public Library). > > That's really a hoot. Obama was 8 years old when Ayers set off bombs. > > > He may not recall that at the time, there was a > > huge controversy, primarily on the left, about > > whether Sirhan Sirhan had shot Kennedy. As with > > JFK's assassination, there were all kinds of > > conspiracy theories, among them that Sirhan was > > a "Manchurian candidate" who had been hypnotized > > by people who wanted RFK dead (and there were > > all kinds of groups that feared him) and > > programmed to be the fall guy for someone else, > > who was never identified or captured, who had > > actually fired the shots that killed RFK. > > > Although he confessed to the crime, Sirhan > > claimed he did not remember the shooting. > > > > That Ayers considered Sirhan a "political > > prisoner" indicates that he assumed Sirhan was > > actually innocent. > > > > In other words, Ayers was not *applauding* the > > assassination of RFK by including Sirhan in the > > list of people to whom the book was dedicated, > > but rather condemning the U.S. government for > > having convicted him of a crime he did not > > commit, presumably to conceal the identity of > > the real killer. > > I remember the Manchurian candidate story. Regardless, Sirhan pulled > trigger and many witnessed it. The far left, and the likes of Ayers, > used Sirhan's lack of memory of his crime to manufacture a conspiracy > theory, casting suspicion on the rightwing of our government who they > feared would win the election. The much-hated Republican, Nixon, beat > Humphrey by a landslide. The left believed that had RFK won the > primary he may have had a chance to beat Nixon. The left couldn't bear > the loss of RFK. He was their hope for ending an unjust Vietnam War, > an example of American imperialism. At the time, Vietnam whipped > Anti-American sentiment into a frenzy. Ayers wallowed in it and still > does and I suspect Obama's friends residing under the bus, Wright, and > Pfleger do as well. Was Sirhan a Manchurian Candidate? No, that title > fits Obama. > > From the next post on this, quoting Bud White: > > > > > Obama and Ayers, friends and collaborators; > > > Obama endorsed Ayers' book, Ayers dedicated > > > his book to Sirhan Sirhan, an anti-Israeli > > > terrorist and murderer of Bobby Kennedy. > > > > Yeesh. Obama didn't endorse "Prairie Fire," he > > endorsed Ayers's "A Kind and Just Parent: > > Children of Juvenile Court," an account of the > > U.S. juvenile court system, which was published > > in 1997, and most certainly was not dedicated > > to Sirhan Sirhan. > > > > It's impossible White doesn't know this, so you'd > > have to call what I just quoted a deliberate > > attempt to mislead. > > You're correct. Obama was only 8 when Ayers wrote Prairie Fire. White > tries to connect too many dots. Yet, the dots remain. >
