--- In [email protected], "claudiouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder about this obssession, genuinely felt of course, 
> concerning "correct" mantras - whether they are right for one's body 
> type or householder status or whatever. Is it more 
> about "reinforcement" for the EGO, to inspire and motivate it - it  
> needs to feel that it's doing something unique and special and 
> exclusive etc for it to perservere along the meditative path; same 
> with its "religious" affiliations - only ITS version is the TRUE 
> religion, meditation technique, mantra etc.
> 
> What if this is another of Nature's tricks.. like love and sex - we 
> are catapulted into feelings and  behaviours that serve quite a 
> different "purpose" (the SURVIVAL of the species). Suppose it doesn't 
> matter WHAT the mantra is - one is supported in the practice by the 
> BELIEF that it is the ONLY path etc - Nature's way of ensuring 
> regular practice and, eventually, the LIBERATION of the species.
> 
> Although there MAY BE finer aspects of mantra choice that are more or 
> less facilitative for transcending purposes, I wonder if in the scale 
> of effects it is THAT important. I'm sure, for instance, that one can 
> have an OK life living in a building with a southern entrance. Guru 
> Dev's cave might not have been "ideal" (was it?) but then much of 
> life isn't.. one has to make do with imperfections and still move on.
> 
> But the most persuasive argument, I think, is that even in the 
> ABSENCE of Vedic knowledge there have been individuals who did attain 
> higher states of consciousness and even siddhi powers from entirely 
> different traditions - Buddhist, Christian etc.
> 
> If the process is mental with correlated physiology, perhaps no 
> matter what the "sound" impulse one takes as a mantra initially is, 
> it will get duly "refined" and result in transcendental 
> consciousness. In fact the more biological one views this human 
> capacity the less the cultural character of the vehicle for 
> transcendence becomes.
> 
> The fact that Maharishi changed his mantras about and didn't give non-
> householder mantras to people who effectively opted for the reclusive 
> lives etc further emphasises the flexibility, perhaps, of mantra 
> choice...

Who has MMY ever dealt with in the TMO who has opted for a reclusive life? MMY 
characterizes himself as a householder in this context.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to