--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2005, at 10:08 AM, t3rinity wrote: > > > Why only connected to it? Why not BE it? > > When referring to separateness it is helpful to point out that you can > BE connected.
We have to refere to separateness, when we talk about communication, exchange of energies, positive or negative. In this case emotions have a place. The question: How can you reject (through anger) your own self (in the other), is rather irrelevant I think. On the level of being you are the other already, and there is no way to separate. On the level of relative action, you have to deal with the situation. > Not everyone experiences that. The realization is that > all arises interdependently, the network and the node, so yes it's a > form of beingness To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
