OFF: > John never said anything bad about Maharishi, you are imagining it, and > all the others strongly supprt it.
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: You know what goes good with crow Off? Whole cumin seeds. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYyTsi3By5w > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , off_world_beings <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, Jerry Seinfeld, Ringo Starr, and Howard Stern are secret > Hindus. > > > > > > At night they dress up in loin clothes and beads, and worship > a statue > > > > > > of an elephant god, and. sing hare krishna songs. > > > > > > > > > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > > > > I know, why don't people listen to the Beatles more about TM, > like when they all left India and wrote songs about what an > opportunistic un-holy man Maharishi was...what was that?...we should > listen to them NOW but not listen to them in the same decade when they > actually spent time with Maharishi...gotcha! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, Curtis it wasn't the four Beatles who were writing > "songs about what an opportunistic un-holy man Maharishi was", as you > put it, it was just ONE of those Beatles -- John Lennon -- and every > indication was that the others did not share with him those sentiments. > > > > > > No actually, before his weed induced amnesia, Paul was just as > dismissive of Maharishi when he came back and it is all on tape. > > > > > Quite true. It's there for all to see when John and Paul were on the > Tonight Show with Joe Garagiola guest hosting. Paul says "we though he > was more than a man. But he's just a man." John says "we made a > mistake".>> > > Ha ha, the fanatical anti-TM'rs are clutching at straws. John never put > Maharishi down. That statement is just an observation about their own > mistake, not Maharish's. And George, Paul, and Ringo have all supprted > Maharishi in recernt decades. George even had a similar concert in > London in 1992 to support Maharishi, Paul, Ringo, and Julian Lennon > considered coming, but had other commitments. > > The fundamentalist anti-TM crowd are in denial. Its worse than the > Republicans last year saying that Iraq is going swimmingly and the > economy is in great shape. > > I am serious. It matters not to me wether the Beatles support TM or not. > I am worried about you and Curtis and others' psycholoy. It is form a > psychosis to cling to your false hopes of denying the obvious facts. > Seriously, this is surreal, the way you are clingin to old and unproven > gossip and conspiracy theories. Psychotic. > > John never said anything bad about Maharishi, you are imagining it, and > all the others strongly supprt it. Yoko Ono learnned the sidhis later. > And by the way, she was at this recent concer too ! > > The only one that said bad stuff about Maharishi was Magic Alex, John > Lennoon's drug supplier. You are STILL being duped by the long dead > Magic Alex, and all the other Beatles have supported Maharishi for > decades. Linda McCartney learned TM and Paul's daughter learned TM back > in the late 1980's. > > Its over, history is written guys. Your psychosis is laughable. > > OffWorld >
