--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "geezerfreak" <geezerfreak@> wrote:
> >
> > There is a fascination that I think we all have (those 
> > who are now outside lookin' in that is) with folks who, 
> > after all these years and all of the clear evidence in 
> > front of them, still buy the basic party line. And I 
> > don't mean this in a "petri dish" way. As I said before 
> > I am acutely aware of the fact that I held same beliefs 
> > for many years. And, the fact is....she could be right 
> > about all of this and I could be dead wrong. 
> 
> OK, here it is, the ultimate test of whether the 
> TM defenders on this forum are fundamentalists
> and cultists or not. Geezer's simple statement 
> above is one that I heartily agree with and have 
> *no problem* "seconding." *Of course* there is a 
> possibility that the TM defenders here are right 
> and I am wrong. I am fairly certain that Curtis 
> would also have no problem agreeing with this.
> 
> But here's the test: Can any of the TM defenders
> on this forum say that?
> 
> WILL any of them say that?
> 
> Judy ?
> Nabby ?
> Off ?
> I Am The Eternal ?
> Raunchydog ?
> shukra69 ?
> Jim / enlightened_dawn11 ?
> sparaig ?
> 
> How 'bout it. It's a VERY simple question. Are
> you willing to agree with Geezerfreak's state-
> ment above, in the converse? Are you willing to 
> state categorically in public, "There is a 
> possibility that the TM critics here are right 
> and I am wrong?"
> 
> Any of the above-listed posters who fail to 
> answer are IMO pussies.
> 
> They can answer "Yes" or they can answer "No, 
> but failure to answer in this case can and IMO
> should be interpreted as a big, fat "No." And 
> IMO *that* should be interpreted as fundament-
> alism and the non-response of the "cultwhipped."
>
What's the criticism?

Judy and most other "TBers" on this forum agree with the
TM critics on certain points already. On others, they disagree
vehemently. SO, here's the converse question:

could it be that the TBers are right afterall?


L


Reply via email to