--- In [email protected], "Richard M" <compost...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: <snip> > > It's basically the difference between sudden > > realization vs. gradual realization. Some people > > have the capacity to realize their essential > > fruitiness :-) other have to plant a seed, grow > > a tree and wait for the fruit to ripen. > > Much more comprehensible. By comparison "acausal > pathless paths" is just pompous. > > Some musicians have perfect pitch; some have to work > at it. The former are not on an "acausal pathless > path" and the use of such pseudo-analytical language > is hardly going to help anyone tune their guitar?
Plus which, it's *still* just semantics with reference to the original issue as to whether there are any paths that aren't selling a modified future. One way or another, they all do--including the "acausal pathless path"--as Alex suggested to start with.
