--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard M" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > <snip> > > > It's basically the difference between sudden > > > realization vs. gradual realization. Some people > > > have the capacity to realize their essential > > > fruitiness :-) other have to plant a seed, grow > > > a tree and wait for the fruit to ripen. > > > > Much more comprehensible. By comparison "acausal > > pathless paths" is just pompous. > > > > Some musicians have perfect pitch; some have to work > > at it. The former are not on an "acausal pathless > > path" and the use of such pseudo-analytical language > > is hardly going to help anyone tune their guitar? > > Plus which, it's *still* just semantics with reference > to the original issue as to whether there are any paths > that aren't selling a modified future. One way or another, > they all do--including the "acausal pathless path"--as > Alex suggested to start with. >
Yes, quite so.
