On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:43 AM, Bhairitu wrote:

>> I have to be honest, I have a hard time with these dichotomous labels
>> although of course it's helpful for talking about things--and sure
>> there are Buddhists who are gungho with that label and Hindu tantrics
>> who are the same way. I'm a Nath and Rime (non-sectarian) practitioner
>> and don't see a need to side with a camp or a sect. The Nath are said
>> to 'practice Hinduism by day and Buddhism by night'. The core that 
>> just
>> awakens and is not a religion is what appeals to me personally. Both
>> are marvelous. So to answer your question, yeah both and I love them
>> both. My Nath guru was the last holder of a sect of Uttara 
>> Kaulas...but
>> he was also recognized as a lama by the Kagyupas, loved taoism and so
>> on. It's a non-sectarian trip, a maxim is "don't get caught in limits,
>> don't belong to a school."
>>
>>
>>
> But I find it important in understanding these schools of thought to
> delineate.  To me to "not" try to discern is some kind of "new age"
> philosophy.

I couldn't agree more. At the same time there are blatant similarities 
which cannot be ignored. For example the Buddhist kalachakra tantra 
contains an entire Hindu agama inside it, the Shiva-swarodaya. Cave 
practices done by Tibetan yogis in isolation are also similar those 
used by Shaivite yogins--the important difference being their "View", 
their POV and cosmology. I respect and understand the reasons for not 
"mixing" but I also will always take the opportunity to break bread 
with other practitioners whenever I can. It's just too compelling to 
ignore.

Don't even get me started on New Age emetics...;-)

>    I don't seem that much semblance between what I've seen in
> Buddhist tantra and what I've learned in Indian tantra.   What we *do*
> see is the similarity in more abstract terms of shamans, tantrics, 
> witch
> doctors, voodoo in the manipulation of the realm of physics through
> "supernatural means."  IOW, technology that current material based
> science has yet to comprehend.

Well and methods are similar or often the same. It's also important 
that we're comparing apples to apples--Hindu anuttara tantra to 
Buddhist anuttara tantra. Most Hindu tantras that I see people 
practicing are outer tantras, so it is important to know what type of 
tantra we're talking about. There are entire tantras which we can see 
in Shaivism--particularly Kapalika ones--which made their way into 
Tantric Buddhism. And vice versa. There were many practices which made 
their way from Bon and Dzogchen to Kashmir Hindu yogis. Alain Danielou 
has done a great job at showing the 'what and how' of Shaivism that 
made it's way into Buddhism; conversely Bon and Nyingma practitioners 
have told how their trads. were shared in the opposite flow. Really it 
is quite amazing as the kingdom of Zhang Zhung--the trad. region of 
Tibetan culture centered around Mt. Kailash--is home to many teachings 
other than Buddhism. Kailash is the sacred abode to Shiva and Parvati, 
the Taoists, the Bonpos and others. It's an exciting web of 
possibilities.

>> He is a married lama and translator--IIRC he has a good amount of
>> exposure to Hindu tantra, but practices Buddha-dharma and Dzogchen. 
>> The
>> translation in question is a Buddhist version of the lives of the 84
>> Mahasiddhas and so for that reason the intro. covers that context
>> primarily.
>>
>>
>>>  There is a belief that many of the
>>> "Indiaphiles" are actually reincarnates of people who in the 
>>> twentieth
>>> century died in the upheavals in India and Tibet are that is why some
>>> are attracted to  Hindu thought and some to Buddhist.
>>>
>>> - Bhairitu
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yeah I know some who have memories of the Tibetan and Islamic diaspora
>> in Tibet and in India. What can I say...god recycles ;-).
>>
> On my arrival in Bombay I was overtaken with emotions of "you are
> home."  I tried putting it in check as some kind of mood making but it
> would not go away.  I felt far more at home in India with the Indian
> people than I ever have in the US.  Perhaps you would feel the same
> visiting Tibet?

Maybe. I've always been very happy wherever I was. Except maybe Florida 
in the summertime...



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to