--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > > > Nice rap/reply. Enjoyed all of it. And what a refreshing perspective > > > from the usual fare we get here. I haven't read ahead, but likely > you > > > will have provoked the outrage of others who are always at the ready > to > > > slam a perspective that runs counter to their views. > > > > Oh baloney. I've read RC's posts just to see how he thinks. He has a > uniquely functioning mind and I find that fascinating. He has an amazing > story to tell in the context of a TM movement history we share and > that's fascinating as well. What's to criticize? I wouldn't have wanted > to face the challenges he has had just as he wouldn't have wanted to > face the challenges I've had. Everyone's journey has surprising twists > and turns...it just a ride. > > > Exactly how I feel. >
My own take is that MZ, like many others on this forum (most others?) is stuck in some way. IT is an interesting thing to note that those who are laying claim to full enlightenment reject MMY's assertion that perfect performance of all the sidhis is a test of full enlightenment. One presumes this is because none of them can perfectly perform all the sidhis. Certainly, from what MZ says, if he WAS able to perfectly perform all the sidhis, he wouldn't be claiming that it is merely an illusory state. Ironically, I think that MMY's comment may have been directed specifically at HIM, personally. Which goes back to the point about shared history. MZ is the person, I believe for whom that quote was crafted in the first place. It is ironic that he rejects the quote while asserting that his state is exactly what MMY implied it was: not really all there yet. L
