Barry I have read your message and I disagree with everything you say
:-).
I have plenty to say both when dealing with the "low vibe", "slime ball"
writers and otherwise. I do have a life, works, friends, family - thanks
for asking.  I can't get to post until late in the day most of the
times. So you are completely wrong that I'm here for attention except
yours and other "low vibe", "slime ball" wannabe writers. And I have
completely different way of looking things than Judy, we both seem to be
very emotionally secure and seem to sometimes come to a similar
conclusion especially if it involves certain "low vibe", "slime ball"
writer wannabes. The BATGAP interview is only a lie for the "low vibe",
"slime ball" types since it becomes easy for me to play a similar game
as them.
--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > Barry - I think she will be around as long as you, Vaj and
> > other "lowvibe", "slime ball" posters (your own words)
> > continue to indulge in your lies and deception. It seems
> > you would like to wish she disappear...
>
> > ...it's not pleasant for her deal with "low vibe", "slime
> > ball" posters, it's not pleasant for others, sure she does
> > come on strong but I'm glad she does what she does.
> > Thanks Judy !!
>
> Ravi, let's review a little bit, shall we? YOU are
> the person with the most egregious history of lying
> on this forum. You came to *as the result of a lie*,
> having conned Rick into thinking you were awakened.
> You have since admitted many times that this was the
> case. You, in fact, have no history with TM or MMY
> at all, never having learned TM. But here you are,
> week after week, sucking energy on FFL because (IMO)
> it's the only attention you've ever gotten in your
> entire life, and now you're addicted to it.
>
> Judy never busts you on your *admitted* lies because
> you're in her "posse." She can count on you to "pile
> on" to the same people she tries to demonize, as part
> of her ongoing obsessive behavior.
>
> You like Judy IMO *because* she's a classic example
> of obsession, and that enables you to "pile on" to
> the people on her Enemies List. If she weren't doing
> this, I don't think I'm alone here in believing that
> you wouldn't have anything else to say.
>
> Unlike Judy, I'm not trying to convince anyone of
> anything or get them to act the way they "should."
> I merely present opinions, and allow people to react
> to them (or not) as they choose. I stopped interfacing
> with Judy directly some time ago, and it's as if she
> never noticed. She keeps writing "to" me, but IMO
> only because that gives her an opportunity to rag on
> one of her enemies *for the lurkers*. It's people like
> YOU she's writing to, not me. She's hoping to suck you
> into her obsession, and get you to obsess on it as
> well.
>
> For most people on this forum, that has not worked.
> They have lives.
>
> It's worked on you, and based on what you post here you
> don't seem to have much of one, other than to pile on
> to Other People's Obsessions and Other People's Enemies,
> in a kind of continual, needy "Look at me...look at me"
> act.
>
> My suggestion is that the people who ignore Judy's
> obsession and her continual (a minimum of 50% of her
> posts every week devoted to trying to "get" either Vaj,
> Curtis or myself) attempts to suck other people into
> it have somewhat strong minds, and lives. The only
> people she's managed to suck into this obsession so
> far don't strike me as either having very strong minds,
> or much going on for them in terms of having a life.
>
> The preceding was opinion. I don't ask that anyone
> agree with it, and I don't care whether they believe
> it. Now run that same test against Judy's rants. Seems
> to me that she cares VERY MUCH that other people not
> only agree with her, but act out the way she does,
> and join her in her obsession. It's probably a good
> thing that you and maybe three others on this forum
> do so, or she'd have to come to grips with the fact
> that her whole multi-year vendetta on this forum was
> a waste of time, and a waste of life.
>

Reply via email to