Oops. Sometimes I send a message from another unregistered account and it shows up as a private email to that person. Anyway, just to keep this open where I intended it to be, here is your response to me:
Jim, look~~that was said as a friend. If you don't like it by all means put me on ignore. Or continue these angry responses. Or, conversely, you can actually try and communicate with those you disagree with. The first 2 will be far more trouble than they're worth, but it's entirely up to you. Cheers. Sal my response: And what, my dear friend, is wrong with me responding to you, or anyone else, any way I see fit? Also, what is wrong with being angry? Is that a forbidden emotion here on FFL? Perhaps we oughta check...Rick and/or Alex, is it OK to express anger here? Sal needs to know ASAP. We can have someone like Barry crapping all over people as he chooses, with not a peep out of you, Sal, and the minute I say something, I am out of line? There is nothing spiritual or expansive or helpful in what Barry says. He has said himself that he is a troll on here, so sometimes I feel like pointing that out. Try living with THAT for a moment. Cheers. Jim --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@...> wrote: > > On Oct 5, 2011, at 9:22 AM, whynotnow7 wrote: > > > Ah yes, our other ray of sunshine on FFL - snarling from underneath her > > rock as usual, spreading her vitriol of lost dreams. How are you, Sal? Got > > anything nice to say, ever? > > I already said it in my response to the private email you sent > me, Jim. But I'll be happy to repost if you > didn't get it. > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 5, 2011, at 6:26 AM, whynotnow7 wrote: > >> > >>> As a result of doing TM, the Beatles were so much more successful and > >>> happier than you are, or will ever be. > >>> > >>> Your well-worn schtick of writing nasty, outrageous things to get a rise > >>> out of decent people has become stupid and boring. > >> > >> What's "nasty and outrageous" about what Barry said, > >> Jim? Does the obvious joke about Lynch really offend > >> your widdle sensibilities that much? > >> > >>> To inflame and offend the sensibilities of ordinary folk is something you > >>> see as a sneering little triumph, when all it is, is an infantile game > >>> you reflexively play to the tune of your shriveled heart. > >> > >> Aw, poor Jim was offended. And like a brat, he has > >> to try and say whatever he can to stamp out the offender. > >> > >> > >>> Go ahead and criticize everything that others hold dear. What a big man > >>> you appear to yourself, and what a miserable little runt you appear to > >>> the rest of us. > >> > >> *Now* who's being nasty and outrageous? > >> And who entitled you to speak for the group? > >> Jim, have you > >> ever considered some serious counseling? Or simply taking > >> a break from FFL until you can manage some self-control? > >> It sounds like, like your leader Judy, you are close > >> to something, and whatever it is it ain't good. > >> Good luck trying to stamp out all the people out in > >> the real world who say whatever it is you don't like. > >> Sal > >> > >>> > >>> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Gawd. Is there ANYTHING more embarrassing than still > >>>> trying to use the Beatles -- even dead Beatles -- to > >>>> sell TM? > >>>> > >>>> Oh yeah...I forgot. There's trying to use David Lynch > >>>> -- who only looks dead -- for the same thing. > >>> > >> > > >
